40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A variety of engineered scaffolds have been created for tissue engineering using polymers, ceramics and their composites. Biomimicry has been adopted for majority of the three-dimensional (3D) scaffold design both in terms of physicochemical properties, as well as bioactivity for superior tissue regeneration. Scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching, particle sintering, hydrogels and lithography have been successful in promoting cell growth in vitro and tissue regeneration in vivo. Scaffold systems derived from decellularization of whole organs or tissues has been popular due to their assured biocompatibility and bioactivity. Traditional scaffold fabrication techniques often failed to create intricate structures with greater resolution, not reproducible and involved multiple steps. The 3D printing technology overcome several limitations of the traditional techniques and made it easier to adopt several thermoplastics and hydrogels to create micro-nanostructured scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering and drug delivery. This review highlights scaffold fabrication methodologies with a focus on optimizing scaffold performance through the matrix pores, bioactivity and degradation rate to enable tissue regeneration. Review highlights few examples of bioactive scaffold mediated nerve, muscle, tendon/ligament and bone regeneration. Regardless of the efforts required for optimization, a shift in 3D scaffold uses from the laboratory into everyday life is expected in the near future as some of the methods discussed in this review become more streamlined.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hydrogels for tissue engineering.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Silk as a Biomaterial.

              Silks are fibrous proteins with remarkable mechanical properties produced in fiber form by silkworms and spiders. Silk fibers in the form of sutures have been used for centuries. Recently regenerated silk solutions have been used to form a variety of biomaterials, such as gels, sponges and films, for medical applications. Silks can be chemically modified through amino acid side chains to alter surface properties or to immobilize cellular growth factors. Molecular engineering of silk sequences has been used to modify silks with specific features, such as cell recognition or mineralization. The degradability of silk biomaterials can be related to the mode of processing and the corresponding content of beta sheet crystallinity. Several primary cells and cell lines have been successfully grown on different silk biomaterials to demonstrate a range of biological outcomes. Silk biomaterials are biocompatible when studied in vitro and in vivo. Silk scaffolds have been successfully used in wound healing and in tissue engineering of bone, cartilage, tendon and ligament tissues.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101685294
                45403
                Bioact Mater
                Bioact Mater
                Bioactive materials
                2452-199X
                8 December 2016
                20 December 2016
                December 2016
                01 December 2017
                : 1
                : 2
                : 93-108
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
                [b ]Institute for Regenerative Engineering, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
                [c ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
                [d ]Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Saint Joseph, Hartford, CT, 06103, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Saint Joseph, Hartford, CT, USA. srudraiah@ 123456usj.edu (S. Rudraiah)
                [** ]Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA. Kumbar@ 123456uchc.edu (S.G. Kumbar)
                [1]

                SS and NS contributed equally to the review.

                Article
                NIHMS833899
                10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001
                5482547
                28653043
                299f7826-6e89-4e9c-a3dd-4deca6992025

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                bioactive,biomaterials,scaffold,porosity,biodegradable,tissue regeneration

                Comments

                Comment on this article