4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The moderating role of emotional self-efficacy and gender in teacher empathy and inclusive education

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The role of teacher empathy is recognized as a key factor in improving teacher–student interaction, motivation and academic performance. Despite the importance of teacher empathy, its role in promoting inclusive education is still largely unknown. High levels of empathy are not necessarily associated with greater ability to implement inclusive education, as they can lead to excessive emotional engagement and stress, which negatively affect teachers' abilities. Therefore, the present study explored whether the relationship between high empathy and perceived ability to implement inclusive education could be moderated by other variables, such as emotional self-efficacy and gender. A large sample of Italian support teachers (N = 739; M age = 37.7; females = 86.9%) was recruited for this study. We found that higher levels of empathy were related to higher levels of self-efficacy in inclusive education, especially when levels of emotional self-efficacy were higher. This relationship was only found for female teachers. The results contribute to knowledge about the role of teachers' empathy for inclusion as well as the moderating role of the ability to regulate negative emotions. The study has implications for pre-service teacher education and in-service teacher training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The theory of planned behavior

            Icek Ajzen (1991)
            Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sofia.mastrokoukou@unito.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                29 September 2024
                29 September 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 22587
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Turin, ( https://ror.org/048tbm396) Via Verdi 10, 10124 TO Turin, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, ( https://ror.org/048tbm396) Turin, Italy
                Article
                70836
                10.1038/s41598-024-70836-2
                11439961
                39343767
                29a0229d-b589-4d07-a02b-fdae97c28c0a
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 February 2024
                : 21 August 2024
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                support teacher,inclusive education,emotional self-efficacy,empathy,gender differences,psychology,environmental social sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article