46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data

      research-article
      , ,
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fluid bolus therapy (FBT) is a standard of care in the management of the septic, hypotensive, tachycardic and/or oliguric patient. However, contemporary evidence for FBT improving patient-centred outcomes is scant. Moreover, its physiological effects in contemporary ICU environments and populations are poorly understood. Using three electronic databases, we identified all studies describing FBT between January 2010 and December 2013. We found 33 studies describing 41 boluses. No randomised controlled trials compared FBT with alternative interventions, such as vasopressors. The median fluid bolus was 500 ml (range 100 to 1,000 ml) administered over 30 minutes (range 10 to 60 minutes) and the most commonly administered fluid was 0.9% sodium chloride solution. In 19 studies, a predetermined physiological trigger initiated FBT. Although 17 studies describe the temporal course of physiological changes after FBT in 31 patient groups, only three studies describe the physiological changes at 60 minutes, and only one study beyond this point. No studies related the physiological changes after FBT with clinically relevant outcomes. There is a clear need for at least obtaining randomised controlled evidence for the physiological effects of FBT in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock beyond the period immediately after its administration.

          ‘Just as water retains no shape, so in warfare there are no constant conditions’

          Sun Tzu (‘The Art of War’)

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0696-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure

          Introduction Despite significant improvements in intensive care medicine, the prognosis of acute renal failure (ARF) remains poor, with mortality ranging from 40% to 65%. The aim of the present observational study was to analyze the influence of patient characteristics and fluid balance on the outcome of ARF in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods The data were extracted from the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study, a multicenter observational cohort study to which 198 ICUs from 24 European countries contributed. All adult patients admitted to a participating ICU between 1 and 15 May 2002, except those admitted for uncomplicated postoperative surveillance, were eligible for the study. For the purposes of this substudy, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had ARF. The groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics, fluid balance, and outcome. Results Of the 3,147 patients included in the SOAP study, 1,120 (36%) had ARF at some point during their ICU stay. Sixty-day mortality rates were 36% in patients with ARF and 16% in patients without ARF (P < 0.01). Oliguric patients and patients treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) had higher 60-day mortality rates than patients without oliguria or the need for RRT (41% versus 33% and 52% versus 32%, respectively; P < 0.01). Independent risk factors for 60-day mortality in the patients with ARF were age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), heart failure, liver cirrhosis, medical admission, mean fluid balance, and need for mechanical ventilation. Among patients treated with RRT, length of stay and mortality were lower when RRT was started early in the course of the ICU stay. Conclusion In this large European multicenter study, a positive fluid balance was an important factor associated with increased 60-day mortality. Outcome among patients treated with RRT was better when RRT was started early in the course of the ICU stay.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols on hospital length of stay and mortality in septic shock patients: results of a three-year follow-up quasi-experimental study.

              To describe the effectiveness of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles with regard to both implementation and outcome in patients with septic shock and to determine the contribution of the various elements of the bundles to the outcome. Quasi-experimental study with a historical comparison group. The three medical-surgical intensive care units of an academic tertiary care center. A total of 384 adult patients in septic shock were enrolled after the educational intervention (September 2005-August 2008) and 96 patients in the historical group (June 2004-May 2005). A hospital-wide quality improvement program based on the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines performed between June 2005 and August 2005. In-hospital mortality was reduced from 57.3% in the historical group to 37.5% in the intervention group (p = .001). This difference remained significant after controlling for confounding factors (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.89). The intervention group had also lower length of stay for survivors in the hospital (36.2 +/- 34.8 days vs. 41.0 +/- 26.3 days; p = .043) and in the intensive care units (8.4 +/- 9.8 days vs. 11.0 +/- 9.5 days; p = .004). Improvements in survival were related to the number of bundle interventions completed (p for trend or =70% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.99; p = .048). The implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines was associated with a significant decrease in mortality. The benefits depend on the number of interventions accomplished within the time limits. The 6-hr resuscitation bundle showed greater compliance and effectiveness than the 24-hr management bundle.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                neil.glassford@austin.org.au
                glenn.eastwood@austin.org.au
                rinaldo.bellomo@austin.org.au
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                27 December 2014
                2014
                : 18
                : 6
                : 696
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3084 Australia
                [ ]Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia
                [ ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125 Australia
                Article
                696
                10.1186/s13054-014-0696-5
                4331149
                25673138
                29b91f58-44c5-42d3-ba40-dabebdeabb9e
                © Glassford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                The licensee has exclusive rights to distribute this article, in any medium, for 12 months following its publication. After this time, the article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article