8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long‐term health‐related quality of life among men with prostate cancer in the Finnish randomized study of screening for prostate cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The long‐term health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) impacts of PCa screening have not been adequately evaluated. We aimed to compare the generic and disease‐specific health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) among men with prostate cancer in the screening arm with the control arm of the PSA‐based prostate cancer screening trial in up to 15 years of follow‐up.

          Materials and methods

          This study was conducted within population‐based Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC). During 1996‐1999 80,458 men were randomized to the serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening arm (SA, N = 32 000) and the control arm (CA, N = 48 458). Men in the screening arm were screened at 4‐year intervals until 2007. HRQOL questionnaires were delivered to newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in the screening and control arm 1996‐2006 (N = 5128) at the time of diagnosis (baseline), at 3‐month, 12‐month and 5, 10, and 15‐year follow‐up. Validated UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA‐PCI) and RAND 36‐Item Health Survey were used for HRQOL assessment. The data were analyzed with a random effects model for repeated measures.

          Results

          At baseline, men with prostate cancer in the screening arm reported better Sexual Function, as well as less Sexual and Urinary Bother. Long‐term follow‐up revealed slightly higher HRQOL scores in the screening arm in prostate cancer specific measures at 10‐year post diagnosis, but the differences were statistically significant only in Urinary Bother (UCLA‐PCI score 77.9; 95% CI 75.2 to 80.5 vs. 70.9; 95% CI 66.8 to 74.9 P = .005). The generic HRQOL scores were comparable between the trial arms. The overall differences in disease‐specific or generic HRQOL scores by trial arm did not vary during the follow‐up.

          Conclusion

          No major differences were observed in HRQOL in men with prostate cancer between the prostate cancer screening and control arms during five to 15‐year follow‐up.

          Abstract

          Our study contributes to the evaluation of the benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening on long‐term quality of life. The results suggest that screening does not materially affect long‐term quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Model‐based mean scores (95% CIs) in Urinary Bother by arm of the FinRSPC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

          The time by which prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening advances prostate cancer diagnosis, called the lead time, has been reported by several studies, but results have varied widely, with mean lead times ranging from 3 to 12 years. A quantity that is closely linked with the lead time is the overdiagnosis frequency, which is the fraction of screen-detected cancers that would not have been diagnosed in the absence of screening. Reported overdiagnosis estimates have also been variable, ranging from 25% to greater than 80% of screen-detected cancers. We used three independently developed mathematical models of prostate cancer progression and detection that were calibrated to incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to estimate lead times and the fraction of overdiagnosed cancers due to PSA screening among US men aged 54-80 years in 1985-2000. Lead times were estimated by use of three definitions. We also compared US and earlier estimates from the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) that were calculated by use of a microsimulation screening analysis (MISCAN) model. The models yielded similar estimates for each definition of lead time, but estimates differed across definitions. Among screen-detected cancers that would have been diagnosed in the patients' lifetimes, the estimated mean lead time ranged from 5.4 to 6.9 years across models, and overdiagnosis ranged from 23% to 42% of all screen-detected cancers. The original MISCAN model fitted to ERSPC Rotterdam data predicted a mean lead time of 7.9 years and an overdiagnosis estimate of 66%; in the model that was calibrated to the US data, these were 6.9 years and 42%, respectively. The precise definition and the population used to estimate lead time and overdiagnosis can be important drivers of study results and should be clearly specified.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Screening for prostate cancer

            Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.

              After 11 years of follow-up, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) reported a 29% reduction in prostate-cancer mortality among men who underwent screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. However, the extent to which harms to quality of life resulting from overdiagnosis and treatment counterbalance this benefit is uncertain. On the basis of ERSPC follow-up data, we used Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN) to predict the number of prostate cancers, treatments, deaths, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained after the introduction of PSA screening. Various screening strategies, efficacies, and quality-of-life assumptions were modeled. Per 1000 men of all ages who were followed for their entire life span, we predicted that annual screening of men between the ages of 55 and 69 years would result in nine fewer deaths from prostate cancer (28% reduction), 14 fewer men receiving palliative therapy (35% reduction), and a total of 73 life-years gained (average, 8.4 years per prostate-cancer death avoided). The number of QALYs that were gained was 56 (range, -21 to 97), a reduction of 23% from unadjusted life-years gained. To prevent one prostate-cancer death, 98 men would need to be screened and 5 cancers would need to be detected. Screening of all men between the ages of 55 and 74 would result in more life-years gained (82) but the same number of QALYs (56). The benefit of PSA screening was diminished by loss of QALYs owing to postdiagnosis long-term effects. Longer follow-up data from both the ERSPC and quality-of-life analyses are essential before universal recommendations regarding screening can be made. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Kirsi.Talala@cancer.fi
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                04 June 2020
                August 2020
                : 9
                : 15 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v9.15 )
                : 5643-5654
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Finnish Cancer Registry Helsinki Finland
                [ 2 ] Department of Urology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
                [ 3 ] Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology Tampere University Tampere Finland
                [ 4 ] Department of Surgery Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
                [ 5 ] Department of Pathology Fimlab Laboratories Tampere Finland
                [ 6 ] Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                [ 7 ] Faculty of Social Sciences/Health Sciences Tampere University Tampere Finland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kirsi Talala, Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, FI‐00130 Helsinki, Finland.

                Email: Kirsi.Talala@ 123456cancer.fi

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9265
                Article
                CAM43181
                10.1002/cam4.3181
                7402814
                32500650
                2a1e1253-f6d1-4a80-8f98-7393047aeb5f
                © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 March 2020
                : 29 April 2020
                : 02 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 3, Pages: 12, Words: 8391
                Funding
                Funded by: Cancer Foundation Finland
                Funded by: Pirkanmaa Hospital District Competitive Research Funding
                Award ID: #9V065
                Funded by: Academy of Finland , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100002341;
                Award ID: #260931
                Categories
                Original Research
                Cancer Prevention
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.6 mode:remove_FC converted:04.08.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prostate cancer,quality of life,screening
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prostate cancer, quality of life, screening

                Comments

                Comment on this article