18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of a TMEM127 variant in a patient with paraganglioma and acromegaly

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          The coincidence of a pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and a pituitary adenoma in the same patient is a rare condition. In the last few years SDHx and MAX mutations have been identified and discussed as a potential causal connection in cases of coincidence. We describe a case of a middle-aged female patient which presented with acromegaly, a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma and a symptomatic neck paraganglioma. The patient was cured by surgery from both the pituitary tumour and the paraganglioma and is well after ten years follow-up. Due to the unusual coexistence of two neuroendocrine tumours, further molecular genetic testing was performed which revealed a variant in the TMEM127 gene (c245-10C>G).

          Learning points:
          • Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and coexisting functioning pituitary adenoma are a very rare condition. An appropriate treatment of each tumour entity with a multi-disciplinary approach and regular follow-up is needed.

          • The possibility of a hereditary disease should be considered and genetic workup is recommended. Genetic testing should focus primarily on the genes with mutations related to pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

          • Next-generation sequencing with multi-gene panel testing is the currently suggested strategy.

          • Genes associated with paragangliomas and pituitary adenomas are SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, MAX and MEN1, while case reports with VHL, RET and NF1 may represent coincidences.

          • Variants of uncertain significance may need ongoing vigilance, in case novel data become available of these variants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans

            Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes that are crucial for the function of an organism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation. However, predicted loss-of-function variants are enriched for annotation errors, and tend to be found at extremely low frequencies, so their analysis requires careful variant annotation and very large sample sizes 1 . Here we describe the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies into the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 443,769 high-confidence predicted loss-of-function variants in this cohort after filtering for artefacts caused by sequencing and annotation errors. Using an improved model of human mutation rates, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum that represents tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve the power of gene discovery for both common and rare diseases.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical Characterization of the Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Susceptibility Genes SDHA, TMEM127, MAX, and SDHAF2 for Gene-Informed Prevention

              This longitudinal registry study assesses the clinical spectra and age-related penetrance in individuals with pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas and mutations in the SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 genes. Question What does testing for the SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 genes add to effective cancer prevention? Findings Of 972 participants in the European-American-Asian Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma Registry without mutations in the classic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma susceptibility genes, 58 probands (6.0%) carried certain or likely pathogenic germline mutations that included 29 in SDHA, 20 in TMEM127, 8 in MAX , and 1 in SDHAF2 . Seven of 63 carriers (relatives and probands) with SDHA and TMEM127 (11%) had malignant pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas. Meaning Gene-informed prevention and/or early detection requires regular whole-body investigation. Importance Effective cancer prevention is based on accurate molecular diagnosis and results of genetic family screening, genotype-informed risk assessment, and tailored strategies for early diagnosis. The expanding etiology for hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas has recently included SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 as susceptibility genes. Clinical management guidelines for patients with germline mutations in these 4 newly included genes are lacking. Objective To study the clinical spectra and age-related penetrance of individuals with mutations in the SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 genes. Design, Setting, and Patients This study analyzed the prospective, longitudinally followed up European-American-Asian Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma Registry for prevalence of SDHA , TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 germline mutation carriers from 1993 to 2016. Genetic predictive testing and clinical investigation by imaging from neck to pelvis was offered to mutation-positive registrants and their relatives to clinically characterize the pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma diseases associated with mutations of the 4 new genes. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and spectra of germline mutations in the SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 genes were assessed. The clinical features of SDHA, TMEM127, MAX , and SDHAF2 disease were characterized. Results Of 972 unrelated registrants without mutations in the classic pheochromocytoma- and paraganglioma-associated genes (632 female [65.0%] and 340 male [35.0%]; age range, 8-80; mean [SD] age, 41.0 [13.3] years), 58 (6.0%) carried germline mutations of interest, including 29 SDHA, 20 TMEM127, 8 MAX , and 1 SDHAF2 . Fifty-three of 58 patients (91%) had familial, multiple, extra-adrenal, and/or malignant tumors and/or were younger than 40 years. Newly uncovered are 7 of 63 (11%) malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in SDHA and TMEM127 disease. SDHA disease occurred as early as 8 years of age. Extra-adrenal tumors occurred in 28 mutation carriers (48%) and in 23 of 29 SDHA mutation carriers (79%), particularly with head and neck paraganglioma. MAX disease occurred almost exclusively in the adrenal glands with frequently bilateral tumors. Penetrance in the largest subset, SDHA carriers, was 39% at 40 years of age and is statistically different in index patients (45%) vs mutation-carrying relatives (13%; P  < .001). Conclusions and Relevance The SDHA , TMEM127, MAX, and SDHAF2 genes may contribute to hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Genetic testing is recommended in patients at clinically high risk if the classic genes are mutation negative. Gene-specific prevention and/or early detection requires regular, systematic whole-body investigation.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                EDM
                Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2052-0573
                03 September 2020
                2020
                : 2020
                : 20-0119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Endocrinology , Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Endocrinology , Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Neurosurgery , Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
                [4 ]Department of Otorhinolarnygology , Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to S Fischli; Email: stefan.fischli@ 123456luks.ch
                Article
                EDM200119
                10.1530/EDM-20-0119
                7576664
                2a44b965-a336-4be1-9334-e4f2c39bff25
                © 2020 The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License..

                History
                : 16 August 2020
                : 03 September 2020
                Categories
                Adult
                Female
                White
                Switzerland
                Adrenal
                Adrenal
                Insight into Disease Pathogenesis or Mechanism of Therapy
                Insight into Disease Pathogenesis or Mechanism of Therapy

                adult,female,white,switzerland,adrenal,insight into disease pathogenesis or mechanism of therapy,september,2020

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log