45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping Control of Erosion Rates: Comparing Model and Monitoring Data for Croplands in Northern Germany

      ,
      One Ecosystem
      Pensoft Publishers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Control of erosion rates (CER) is a key ecosystem service for soil protection. It is mandatory for sustaining the capacity, especially of agroecosystems, to provide ecosystem services. By applying an established framework to assess soil regulating services, this study compares two approaches to assess CER provision for 466 ha of cropland in Lower Saxony (Central Northern Germany). In a "sealed modelling approach", the structural and the mitigated structural impact were modelled by applying the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). The second approach uses spatially explicit long-term monitoring data on soil loss rates obtained in the investigation area as an alternative to the USLE-based modelled mitigated structural impact.

          Assuming that the monitoring data have a higher reliability than the modelled data, the comparison of both approaches demonstrated the uncertainties of the USLE-based assessment of CER. The calculated indicators based on a sound monitoring database on soil loss rates showed that, due to limitations of the USLE model, the structural impact in thalwegs has been underestimated. Incorporating models with the ability to estimate soil loss by rilling und gullying can help to overcome this uncertainty.

          The produced set of complementary large-scale CER maps enables an integrated analyses of CER. In the entire investigation area, the provision of CER regulating ecosystem services was generally high, indicating good management practices. Differences at the field scale and between the different regions can be explained by variations of the structural impact and the management practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                One Ecosystem
                OE
                Pensoft Publishers
                2367-8194
                June 12 2018
                June 12 2018
                : 3
                : e26382
                Article
                10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382
                2ac3fbc7-c568-4d25-ae53-b0e8f55a744c
                © 2018

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article