26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 8 , 1 , 1 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , , The Karolinska COVID-19 Study Group
      Science Immunology
      American Association for the Advancement of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The NK cell activation landscape in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with COVID-19 disease severity.

          Activated NK cells in severe COVID-19

          Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes that provide innate immune defense against viral infections and cancer, but little is known about their involvement in the host response to COVID-19. Maucourant et al. used high-dimensional flow cytometry to characterize NK cells in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with fewer blood NK cells but a higher activation state in circulating NK cells. Severe COVID-19 resulted in an increase in “armed” NK cells containing high levels of cytotoxic proteins such as perforin. The adaptive NK subset was markedly expanded in a subset of severe patients. These findings lay the groundwork for future studies examining the mechanisms of NK cell activation in COVID-19 and their potential roles in host protection and immunopathology.

          Abstract

          Understanding innate immune responses in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important to decipher mechanisms of host responses and interpret disease pathogenesis. Natural killer (NK) cells are innate effector lymphocytes that respond to acute viral infections but might also contribute to immunopathology. Using 28-color flow cytometry, we here reveal strong NK cell activation across distinct subsets in peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients. This pattern was mirrored in single-cell RNA sequencing signatures of NK cells in bronchoalveolar lavage from COVID-19 patients. Unsupervised high-dimensional analysis of peripheral blood NK cells furthermore identified distinct NK cell immunotypes that were linked to disease severity. Hallmarks of these immunotypes were high expression of perforin, NKG2C, and Ksp37, reflecting increased presence of adaptive NK cells in circulation of patients with severe disease. Last, arming of CD56 bright NK cells was observed across COVID-19 disease states, driven by a defined protein-protein interaction network of inflammatory soluble factors. This study provides a detailed map of the NK cell activation landscape in COVID-19 disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

            Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

              Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Immunol
                Sci Immunol
                SciImmunol
                immunology
                Science Immunology
                American Association for the Advancement of Science
                2470-9468
                21 August 2020
                : 5
                : 50
                : eabd6832
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [2 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [3 ]Division of Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [4 ]Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [5 ]Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
                [6 ]K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cancer Immunotherapy, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
                [7 ]SciLifeLab, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [8 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [9 ]Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [10 ]Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
                [11 ]Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Division for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                []Corresponding author. Email: niklas.bjorkstrom@ 123456ki.se
                [‡]

                The members of the Karolinksa COVID-19 Study Group can be found in the Acknowledgments.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1033-2992
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-5500
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-802X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-0927
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-0948
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-5495
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-6425
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-1433
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-4198
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-3606
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-1441
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-6235
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-1719
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-0750
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-5448
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-4752
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2968-6061
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-3169
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-076X
                Article
                abd6832
                10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832
                7665314
                32826343
                2ad42e4f-4801-4321-a195-c20e77304cbe
                Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 July 2020
                : 19 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001729, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004047, Karolinska Institutet;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004047, Karolinska Institutet;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004063, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004348, Stockholms Läns Landsting;
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359, Vetenskapsrådet;
                Funded by: Nordstjernan AB;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                SciImmunol r-articles
                Innate Immune System
                Infectious Disease
                Coronavirus
                Custom metadata
                Ifor Williams
                Fritzie Benzon

                Comments

                Comment on this article