7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Delayed Graft Function Following a Donation-After-Cardiac-Death Kidney Transplant : A Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial compares outcomes among patients who received a donated-after-cardiac-death kidney allograft and either dexmedetomidine or placebo during and after the surgical procedure.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does perioperative use of dexmedetomidine reduce delayed graft function following a donation-after-cardiac-death (DCD) kidney transplant?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial of 111 adults who underwent a DCD kidney transplant, delayed graft function occurred in 17.9% of patients who received the 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine infusion, which was significantly lower than the 34.5% occurrence in patients who received normal saline.

          Meaning

          The findings of this trial support the perioperative use of dexmedetomidine for reducing delayed graft function in DCD kidney transplants.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Delayed graft function (DGF) is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft failure after kidney transplant. Previous studies have suggested that dexmedetomidine may be renoprotective, but whether the use of dexmedetomidine would improve kidney allograft function is unknown.

          Objective

          To investigate the effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine on DGF following a donation-after-cardiac-death (DCD) kidney transplant.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in Suzhou, China. Adults (18 years or older) who were scheduled for DCD kidney transplant were enrolled between September 1, 2019, and January 28, 2021, and then randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine or normal saline (placebo). One-year postoperative outcomes were recorded. All analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat population.

          Interventions

          Patients who were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group received a 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion (0.4 μg/kg/h intraoperatively and 0.1 μg/kg/h postoperatively). Patients who were randomized to the normal saline group received an intravenous infusion of the placebo with the same dose regimen as the dexmedetomidine.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was the incidence of DGF, defined as the need for dialysis in the first posttransplant week. The prespecified secondary outcomes were in-hospital repeated dialysis in the first posttransplant week, in-hospital acute rejection, and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, estimated glomerular filtration rate, need for dialysis, and patient survival on posttransplant day 30.

          Results

          Of the 114 patients enrolled, 111 completed the study (mean [SD] age, 43.4 [10.8] years; 64 male patients [57.7%]), of whom 56 were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group and 55 to the normal saline group. Dexmedetomidine infusion compared with normal saline reduced the incidence of DGF (17.9% vs 34.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .04) and repeated dialysis (12.5% vs 30.9%; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.88; P = .02, which was not statistically significant after multiple testing corrections), without significant effect on other secondary outcomes. Dexmedetomidine vs normal saline infusion led to a higher median (IQR) creatinine clearance rate on postoperative days 1 (9.9 [4.9-21.2] mL/min vs 7.9 [2.0-10.4] mL/min) and 2 (29.6 [9.7-67.4] mL/min vs 14.6 [3.8-45.1] mL/min) as well as increased median (IQR) urine output on postoperative days 2 (106.5 [66.3-175.6] mL/h vs 82.9 [27.1-141.9] mL/h) and 7 (126.1 [98.0-151.3] mL/h vs 107.0 [82.5-137.5] mL/h) and at hospital discharge discharge (110.4 [92.8-121.9] mL/h vs 97.1 [77.5-113.8] mL/h). Three patients (5.5%) from the normal saline group developed allograft failure by the post hoc 1-year follow-up visit.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This randomized clinical trial found that 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of DGF after DCD kidney transplant. The findings support the use of dexmedetomidine in kidney transplants.

          Trial Registration

          Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900025493

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

          Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are routinely used to assess kidney function. Current equations have limited precision and systematically underestimate measured GFR at higher values. To develop a new estimating equation for GFR: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for equation development and validation and a representative sample of the U.S. population for prevalence estimates. Research studies and clinical populations ("studies") with measured GFR and NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to 2006. 8254 participants in 10 studies (equation development data set) and 3896 participants in 16 studies (validation data set). Prevalence estimates were based on 16,032 participants in NHANES. GFR, measured as the clearance of exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate in the development data set; iothalamate and other markers in the validation data set), and linear regression to estimate the logarithm of measured GFR from standardized creatinine levels, sex, race, and age. In the validation data set, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, especially at higher GFR (P < 0.001 for all subsequent comparisons), with less bias (median difference between measured and estimated GFR, 2.5 vs. 5.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), improved precision (interquartile range [IQR] of the differences, 16.6 vs. 18.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and greater accuracy (percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR, 84.1% vs. 80.6%). In NHANES, the median estimated GFR was 94.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR, 79.7 to 108.1) vs. 85.0 (IQR, 72.9 to 98.5) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.6% to 12.4%) versus 13.1% (CI, 12.1% to 14.0%). The sample contained a limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation is more accurate than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and could replace it for routine clinical use. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients.

            (2009)
            The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

              This study determined the responses to increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Ten healthy men (20-27 yr) provided informed consent and were monitored (underwent electrocardiography, measured arterial, central venous [CVP] and pulmonary artery [PAP] pressures, cardiac output, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide [ETCO2], respiration, blood gas, and catecholamines). Hemodynamic measurements, blood sampling, and psychometric, cold pressor, and baroreflex tests were performed at rest and during sequential 40-min intravenous target infusions of dexmedetomidine (0.5, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.2, 5.0, and 8.0 ng/ml; baroreflex testing only at 0.5 and 0.8 ng/ml). The initial dose of dexmedetomidine decreased catecholamines 45-76% and eliminated the norepinephrine increase that was seen during the cold pressor test. Catecholamine suppression persisted in subsequent infusions. The first two doses of dexmedetomidine increased sedation 38 and 65%, and lowered mean arterial pressure by 13%, but did not change central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure. Subsequent higher doses increased sedation, all pressures, and calculated vascular resistance, and resulted in significant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume. Recall and recognition decreased at a dose of more than 0.7 ng/ml. The pain rating and mean arterial pressure increase to cold pressor test progressively diminished as the dexmedetomidine dose increased. The baroreflex heart rate slowing as a result of phenylephrine challenge was potentiated at both doses of dexmedetomidine. Respiratory variables were minimally changed during infusions, whereas acid-base was unchanged. Increasing concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans resulted in progressive increases in sedation and analgesia, decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and memory. A biphasic (low, then high) dose-response relation for mean arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, and vascular resistances, and an attenuation of the cold pressor response also were observed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                3 June 2022
                June 2022
                3 June 2022
                : 5
                : 6
                : e2215217
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
                [2 ]Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
                [3 ]Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
                [5 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
                [6 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento
                [7 ]Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 17, 2022.
                Published: June 3, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15217
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Shan XS et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Ke Peng, MD, PhD ( pengke0422@ 123456163.com ), and Fu-hai Ji, MD, PhD ( jifuhaisuda@ 123456163.com ), Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi St, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China.
                Author Contributions: Drs Peng and Ji had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Shan, Hu, and Wang contributed equally to this study.
                Concept and design: Shan, Pu, Huang, Feng, H. Liu, L. Meng, Peng, Ji.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Shan, Hu, Wang, H.-y. Liu, Chen, X.-w. Meng, Hou, Feng, H. Liu, L. Meng, Peng, Ji.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Shan, Hu, L. Meng.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Shan, Hu, H.-y. Liu, Hou, Feng, L. Meng, Peng.
                Obtained funding: Huang, Ji.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Shan, Wang, H.-y. Liu, Chen, X.-w. Meng.
                Supervision: Pu, Huang, Hou, Feng, H. Liu, Peng, Ji.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr L. Meng reported receiving a consultant fee from Edwards Lifesciences outside of the submitted work. Dr Ji reported receiving personal fees from Yichang Humanwell outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by institutional and departmental sources at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, grants 82072130 and 81873925 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant BK20191171 from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, and grant SLT201909 from the Science and Technology Development Plan Clinical Trial Project.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement : See Supplement 3.
                Additional Contribution: The manuscript was proofread using the service of Vappingo.
                Article
                zoi220444
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15217
                9166619
                35657627
                2add93e2-2593-48ce-a8c7-0b43325dfe63
                Copyright 2022 Shan XS et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 January 2022
                : 17 April 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Anesthesiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article