+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Leukocyte CD14 and CD45 Expression during Hemodialysis: Polysulfone versus Cuprophane

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The expression of CD 14 on monocytes and CD45 on monocytes and granulocytes was evaluated during hemodialysis by flow cytometric analysis in the ‘resting state’ and after in vitro stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). A comparison of complement activating cuprophane (CU) versus less complement activating polysulfone (PS) was undertaken. ‘Resting state’ CD45 expression on granulocytes increased markedly during CU dialysis compared to time 0, whereas this rise was only moderate with PS (CU vs. PS, p < 0.01). When considering the increase in expression upon PMA stimulation, a lower value was obtained during CU dialysis for both CD14 (monocytes at 60 and 240 min) and for CD45 (monocytes and granulocytes at 15 min). In conclusion, granulocytes in the ‘resting state’ expressed more CD45 on their cell membranes during CU dialysis, whereas CD14 and CD45 upregulation after ex vivo addition of PMA was blunted during CU dialysis.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          24 December 2008
          : 74
          : 2
          : 342
          Nephrology Department, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
          189333 Nephron 1996;74:342-348
          © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article