59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence by Forensic Investigators in South Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The discipline of digital forensics requires a combination of skills, qualifications and knowledge in the area of forensic investigation, legal aspects and information technology. The uniqueness of digital evidence makes the adoption of traditional legal approaches problematic. Information technology terminology is currently used interchangeably without any regard to being unambiguous and consistent in relation to legal texts. Many of the information technology terms or concepts have not yet achieved legal recognition. The recognition and standardisation of terminology within a legal context are of the utmost importance to ensure that miscommunication does not occur. To provide clarity or guidance on some of the terms and concepts applicable to digital forensics and for the search and seizure of digital evidence, some of the concepts and terms are reviewed and discussed, using the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 as a point of departure. Digital evidence is often collected incorrectly and analysed ineffectively or simply overlooked due to the complexities that digital evidence poses to forensic investigators. As with any forensic science, specific regulations, guidelines, principles or procedures should be followed to meet the objectives of investigations and to ensure the accuracy and acceptance of findings. These regulations, guidelines, principles or procedures are discussed within the context of digital forensics: what processes should be followed and how these processes ensure the acceptability of digital evidence. These processes include international principles and standards such as those of the Association of Chiefs of Police Officers and the International Organisation of Standardisation. A summary is also provided of the most influential or best-recognised international (IOS) standards on digital forensics. It is concluded that the originality, reliability, integrity and admissibility of digital evidence should be maintained as follows: • Data should not be changed or altered. • Original evidence should not be directly examined. • Forensically sound duplicates should be created. • Digital forensic analyses should be performed by competent persons. • Digital forensic analyses should adhere to relevant local legal requirements. • Audit trails should exist consisting of all required documents and actions. • The chain of custody should be protected. • Processes and procedures should be proper, while recognised and accepted by the industry. If the ACPO (1997) principles and ISO/IEC 27043 and 27037 Standards are followed as a forensic framework, then digital forensic investigators should follow these standards as a legal framework.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals

          H. Hart (1958)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Search Warrants in an Era of Digital Evidence

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              "Digital Searches and the Fourth Amendment: The Interplay between the Plain View Doctrine and Search-protocol Warrant Restrictions"

              S. Guzzi (2012)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                pelj
                PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
                PER
                North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus) (Potchefstroom, North-West Province, South Africa )
                1727-3781
                2019
                : 22
                : 1
                : 1-42
                Affiliations
                [01] orgnameNorth-West University South Africa
                Article
                S1727-37812019000100015
                10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4886
                2af47781-8651-43bd-a6d4-d69cd37cc0ed

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 06 April 2018
                : 02 April 2019
                : 05 April 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 42
                Product

                SciELO South Africa

                Categories
                Articles

                Digital forensics,forensic investigation,digital evidence,digital search and seizure,digital devices,international standards

                Comments

                Comment on this article