6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Day-to-Day Test-Retest Reliability of EEG Profiles in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biomarker development is currently a high priority in neurodevelopmental disorder research. For many types of biomarkers (particularly biomarkers of diagnosis), reliability over short periods is critically important. In the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), resting electroencephalography (EEG) power spectral densities (PSD) are well-studied for their potential as biomarkers. Classically, such data have been decomposed into pre-specified frequency bands (e.g., delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma). Recent technical advances, such as the Fitting Oscillations and One-Over-F (FOOOF) algorithm, allow for targeted characterization of the features that naturally emerge within an EEG PSD, permitting a more detailed characterization of the frequency band-agnostic shape of each individual’s EEG PSD. Here, using two resting EEGs collected a median of 6 days apart from 22 children with ASD and 25 typically developing (TD) controls during the Feasibility Visit of the Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials, we estimate test-retest reliability based on the characterization of the PSD shape in two ways: (1) Using the FOOOF algorithm we estimate six parameters (offset, slope, number of peaks, and amplitude, center frequency and bandwidth of the largest alpha peak) that characterize the shape of the EEG PSD; and (2) using nonparametric functional data analyses, we decompose the shape of the EEG PSD into a reduced set of basis functions that characterize individual power spectrum shapes. We show that individuals exhibit idiosyncratic PSD signatures that are stable over recording sessions using both characterizations. Our data show that EEG activity from a brief 2-min recording provides an efficient window into characterizing brain activity at the single-subject level with desirable psychometric characteristics that persist across different analytical decomposition methods. This is a necessary step towards analytical validation of biomarkers based on the EEG PSD and provides insights into parameters of the PSD that offer short-term reliability (and thus promise as potential biomarkers of trait or diagnosis) vs. those that are more variable over the short term (and thus may index state or other rapidly dynamic measures of brain function). Future research should address the longer-term stability of the PSD, for purposes such as monitoring development or response to treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The temporal structures and functional significance of scale-free brain activity.

            Scale-free dynamics, with a power spectrum following P proportional to f(-beta), are an intrinsic feature of many complex processes in nature. In neural systems, scale-free activity is often neglected in electrophysiological research. Here, we investigate scale-free dynamics in human brain and show that it contains extensive nested frequencies, with the phase of lower frequencies modulating the amplitude of higher frequencies in an upward progression across the frequency spectrum. The functional significance of scale-free brain activity is indicated by task performance modulation and regional variation, with beta being larger in default network and visual cortex and smaller in hippocampus and cerebellum. The precise patterns of nested frequencies in the brain differ from other scale-free dynamics in nature, such as earth seismic waves and stock market fluctuations, suggesting system-specific generative mechanisms. Our findings reveal robust temporal structures and behavioral significance of scale-free brain activity and should motivate future study on its physiological mechanisms and cognitive implications. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders

              Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of complex and heterogeneous developmental disorders involving multiple neural system dysfunctions. In an effort to understand neurophysiological substrates, identify etiopathophysiologically distinct subgroups of patients, and track outcomes of novel treatments with translational biomarkers, EEG (electroencephalography) studies offer a promising research strategy in ASD. Resting-state EEG studies of ASD suggest a U-shaped profile of electrophysiological power alterations, with excessive power in low-frequency and high-frequency bands, abnormal functional connectivity, and enhanced power in the left hemisphere of the brain. In this review, we provide a summary of recent findings, discuss limitations in available research that may contribute to inconsistencies in the literature, and offer suggestions for future research in this area for advancing the understanding of ASD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Integr Neurosci
                Front Integr Neurosci
                Front. Integr. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5145
                30 April 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 21
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, United States
                [2] 2Child Study Center, School of Medicine, Yale University , New Haven, CT, United States
                [3] 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, United States
                [4] 4Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute , Seattle, WA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington , Seattle, WA, United States
                [6] 6Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                [7] 7Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                [8] 8Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL, United States
                [9] 9Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [10] 10Duke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [11] 11Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [12] 12Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: John A. Sweeney, University of Cincinnati, United States

                Reviewed by: Claudio Imperatori, Università Europea di Roma, Italy; Seppo P. Ahlfors, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fnint.2020.00021
                7204836
                32425762
                2b490a14-0b92-47a9-bc88-5c07dca436a9
                Copyright © 2020 Levin, Naples, Scheffler, Webb, Shic, Sugar, Murias, Bernier, Chawarska, Dawson, Faja, Jeste, Nelson, McPartland and §cdilentürk.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 November 2019
                : 23 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 12, Words: 8948
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                eeg,autism,autism spectrum disorder,test-retest,power,fooof,reliability
                Neurosciences
                eeg, autism, autism spectrum disorder, test-retest, power, fooof, reliability

                Comments

                Comment on this article