22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What hemodynamic (fNIRS), electrophysiological (EEG) and autonomic integrated measures can tell us about emotional processing.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Due to its fast temporal evolution and its representation and integration among complex and widespread neural networks, the emotion perception process should preferably be examined by means of multimethodological approach. Indeed the indubitable vantage of acquiring both the autonomic (arousal-related) and the central (cortical-related) activities stands in the possibility to better elucidate the reciprocal interplay of the two compartments. In the present study EEG (frequency band analysis), systemic SCR and heart rate (HR) were all recorded simultaneously with hemodynamic (NIRS, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy) measurements as potential biological markers of emotions, related to both central and peripheral systems. These multiple measures were then related to the self-report correlates, that is the subjective appraisal in term of valence (positive vs. negative) and arousal (high vs. low) by using SAM rating. Twenty subjects were submitted to emotional cues processing (IAPS) when fNIRS, frequency bands (alpha, beta, delta, theta), SCR and HR were recorded. As shown by O2Hb increasing within the right hemisphere, the contribution of prefrontal cortex was elucidated, by pointing out a relevant lateralization effect (more right-PFC activity) induced by the specific valence (negative) of the emotional patterns. Secondly, EEG activity (mainly low-frequency theta and delta bands) was intrinsically associated with the cortical hemodynamic responsiveness to the negative emotional patterns, within the right side. Finally SCR increased mainly in response to negative patterns, and the autonomic behavior was related to explicit (SAM) and cortical (NIRS; EEG) activity. The intrinsic relationships between these three different levels are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Brain Cogn
          Brain and cognition
          1090-2147
          0278-2626
          Apr 2015
          : 95
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Italy; Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: michela.balconi@unicatt.it.
          [2 ] Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
          [3 ] Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Italy; Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
          Article
          S0278-2626(15)00015-9
          10.1016/j.bandc.2015.02.001
          25721430
          2b6a6fcb-c1f8-43dd-bd39-ecb3975db1e8
          Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Appraisal,Emotion,Frequency band,HR,Multimeasure,SCR,fNIRS
          Appraisal, Emotion, Frequency band, HR, Multimeasure, SCR, fNIRS

          Comments

          Comment on this article