0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into prostate cancer nomograms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The decision whether to undergo prostate biopsy must be carefully weighed. Nomograms have widely been utilized as risk calculators to improve the identification of prostate cancer by weighing several clinical factors. The recent inclusion of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings into nomograms has drastically improved their nomogram’s accuracy at identifying clinically significant prostate cancer. Several novel nomograms have incorporated mpMRI to aid in the decision-making process in proceeding with a prostate biopsy in patients who are biopsy-naïve, have a prior negative biopsy, or are on active surveillance. Furthermore, novel nomograms have incorporated mpMRI to aid in treatment planning of definitive therapy. This literature review highlights how the inclusion of mpMRI into prostate cancer nomograms has improved upon their performance, potentially reduce unnecessary procedures, and enhance the individual risk assessment by improving confidence in clinical decision-making by both patients and their care providers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

          Estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 27 major cancers and for all cancers combined for 2012 are now available in the GLOBOCAN series of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We review the sources and methods used in compiling the national cancer incidence and mortality estimates, and briefly describe the key results by cancer site and in 20 large "areas" of the world. Overall, there were 14.1 million new cases and 8.2 million deaths in 2012. The most commonly diagnosed cancers were lung (1.82 million), breast (1.67 million), and colorectal (1.36 million); the most common causes of cancer death were lung cancer (1.6 million deaths), liver cancer (745,000 deaths), and stomach cancer (723,000 deaths). © 2014 UICC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer Statistics, 2021

            Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2017) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2018) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2021, 1,898,160 new cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. After increasing for most of the 20th century, the cancer death rate has fallen continuously from its peak in 1991 through 2018, for a total decline of 31%, because of reductions in smoking and improvements in early detection and treatment. This translates to 3.2 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. Long-term declines in mortality for the 4 leading cancers have halted for prostate cancer and slowed for breast and colorectal cancers, but accelerated for lung cancer, which accounted for almost one-half of the total mortality decline from 2014 to 2018. The pace of the annual decline in lung cancer mortality doubled from 3.1% during 2009 through 2013 to 5.5% during 2014 through 2018 in men, from 1.8% to 4.4% in women, and from 2.4% to 5% overall. This trend coincides with steady declines in incidence (2.2%-2.3%) but rapid gains in survival specifically for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For example, NSCLC 2-year relative survival increased from 34% for persons diagnosed during 2009 through 2010 to 42% during 2015 through 2016, including absolute increases of 5% to 6% for every stage of diagnosis; survival for small cell lung cancer remained at 14% to 15%. Improved treatment accelerated progress against lung cancer and drove a record drop in overall cancer mortality, despite slowing momentum for other common cancers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

              The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol.The 33-item SPIRIT checklist applies to protocols for all clinical trials and focuses on content rather than format. The checklist recommends a full description of what is planned; it does not prescribe how to design or conduct a trial. By providing guidance for key content, the SPIRIT recommendations aim to facilitate the drafting of high-quality protocols. Adherence to SPIRIT would also enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review boards, peer reviewers, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other key stakeholders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Writing original draftRole: Writing review editing
                Role: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing original draftRole: Writing review editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing original draftRole: Writing review editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Urol
                Ther Adv Urol
                TAU
                sptau
                Therapeutic Advances in Urology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1756-2872
                1756-2880
                13 May 2022
                Jan-Dec 2022
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1-17562872221096386]Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                [2-17562872221096386]Department of Urology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                [3-17562872221096386]Department of Urology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [4-17562872221096386]Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                [5-17562872221096386]Department of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                [6-17562872221096386]O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                10.1177_17562872221096386
                10.1177/17562872221096386
                9109484
                35586139
                2b6ec2da-47e5-43f9-b0bd-39a763cad348
                © The Author(s), 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                Categories
                Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
                Review
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                screening,multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging,nomogram,prostatic adenocarcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article