10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quality of life with conservative care compared with assisted peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is little information about quality of life (QoL) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) choosing conservative kidney management (CKM). The Frail and Elderly Patients on Dialysis (FEPOD) study demonstrated that frailty was associated with poorer QoL outcomes with little difference between dialysis modalities [assisted peritoneal dialysis (aPD) or haemodialysis (HD)]. We therefore extended the FEPOD study to include CKM patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (i.e. individuals with ESKD otherwise likely to be managed with dialysis).

          Methods

          CKM patients were propensity matched to HD and aPD patients by age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes status and index of deprivation. QoL outcomes measured were Short Form-12 (SF12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression score, symptom score, Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS) and Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. Generalized linear modelling was used to assess the impact of treatment modality on QoL outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics.

          Results

          In total, 84 (28 CKM, 28 HD and 28 PD) patients were included. Median age for the cohort was 82 (79–88) years. Compared with CKM, aPD was associated with higher SF12 physical component score (PCS) [Exp B (95% confidence interval) = 1.20 (1.00–1.45), P < 0.05] and lower symptom score [Exp B = 0.62 (0.43–0.90), P = 0.01]; depression score was lower in HD compared with CKM [Exp B = 0.70 (0.52–0.92), P = 0.01]. Worsening frailty was associated with higher depression scores [Exp B = 2.59 (1.45–4.62), P < 0.01], IIRS [Exp B = 1.20 (1.12–1.28), P < 0.01] and lower SF12 PCS [Exp B = 0.87 (0.83–0.93), P < 0.01].

          Conclusion

          Treatment by dialysis, both with aPD and HD, improved some QoL measures. Overall, aPD was equal to or slightly better than the other modalities in this elderly population. However, as in the primary FEPOD study, frailty was associated with worse QoL measures irrespective of CKD modality. These findings highlight the need for an individualized approach to the management of ESKD in older people.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

            There is no single generally accepted clinical definition of frailty. Previously developed tools to assess frailty that have been shown to be predictive of death or need for entry into an institutional facility have not gained acceptance among practising clinicians. We aimed to develop a tool that would be both predictive and easy to use. We developed the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale and applied it and other established tools that measure frailty to 2305 elderly patients who participated in the second stage of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA). We followed this cohort prospectively; after 5 years, we determined the ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict death or need for institutional care, and correlated the results with those obtained from other established tools. The CSHA Clinical Frailty Scale was highly correlated (r = 0.80) with the Frailty Index. Each 1-category increment of our scale significantly increased the medium-term risks of death (21.2% within about 70 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5%-30.6%) and entry into an institution (23.9%, 95% CI 8.8%-41.2%) in multivariable models that adjusted for age, sex and education. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that our Clinical Frailty Scale performed better than measures of cognition, function or comorbidity in assessing risk for death (area under the curve 0.77 for 18-month and 0.70 for 70-month mortality). Frailty is a valid and clinically important construct that is recognizable by physicians. Clinical judgments about frailty can yield useful predictive information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Significance of frailty among dialysis patients.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Kidney J
                Clin Kidney J
                ckj
                Clinical Kidney Journal
                Oxford University Press
                2048-8505
                2048-8513
                April 2019
                20 July 2018
                20 July 2018
                : 12
                : 2
                : 262-268
                Affiliations
                [1 ]John Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
                [2 ]Imperial College Renal and Transplant centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
                [3 ]UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
                [4 ]Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
                [5 ]Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, UK
                [6 ]Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
                [7 ]Royal London Hospital, London, UK
                [8 ]St Helier Hospital, Carshalton, UK
                [9 ]Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK
                [10 ]St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence and offprint requests to: Edwina A. Brown; E-mail: e.a.brown@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                Article
                sfy059
                10.1093/ckj/sfy059
                6452183
                30976407
                2b7daeb1-5f39-409a-b64d-6c437d1cf267
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 26 April 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: FEPOD investigators and centres
                Funded by: The Dunhill Medical Trust
                Award ID: R202/0511
                Award ID: R377/0714
                Funded by: Baxter Clinical Evidence Council
                Award ID: 11CECPDEU1006
                Funded by: Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research 10.13039/501100000272
                Funded by: Comprehensive Clinical Research Network
                Funded by: Baxter Healthcare
                Categories
                CKD

                Nephrology
                conservative care,dialysis,end-stage kidney disease,frailty,quality of life
                Nephrology
                conservative care, dialysis, end-stage kidney disease, frailty, quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article