18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Extracellular Water/Intracellular Water Is a Strong Predictor of Patient Survival in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The mortality rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is still high and controversies persist regarding the mortality predictor. This study was designed to identify the predictability of the extracellular water/intracellular water ratio (E/I) on mortality in PD patients. Methods: 227 incident PD patients were included. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the predictability of E/I on mortality. Results: The 2- and 3-year survival was 74 and 65%, respectively. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the significant predictors of mortality were age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, total Kt/V, serum albumin, pulse pressure, presence of malnutrition, and E/I. However, the final Cox proportional hazard models revealed that E/I was the only significant predictor. For every increase of 0.1 in the E/I value, the relative risk of death was 1.368. Conclusions: E/I is a strong independent predictor of mortality in incident PD patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

          A previous study at our center used the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (an index of comorbidity that includes age) to predict outcomes in a mixed group of incident and prevalent dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of the CCI as a predictor in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and to examine whether it was a better predictor than simply the number of comorbid conditions or other known predictors, such as age, albumin level, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Since 1990, we have collected prospectively comorbidity data at the start of PD. All patients with known comorbidity and serum albumin and who did not have a prior history of hemodialysis or transplant were included (n = 268). Time at risk began at day 1 of PD training. Cox proportional hazards best subset selection was used to screen models to predict patient survival. Candidate models were analyzed further for proportionality and other model assumptions. Univariate analysis showed that significant predictors of mortality were CCI (chi-square = 43.3, P < 0.0001), age (chi-square = 23.7, P < 0.0001), cardiac disease (chi-square = 19.9, P <0.0001), number of comorbid conditions (chi-square = 15.6, P < 0.0001), serum albumin at the start of dialysis (chi-square = 15.3, P = 0.0001), and diabetes (chi-square = 4, P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, CCI alone was the best predictor. The addition of serum albumin did not improve the model significantly (chi-square = 51.86 versus 49.34). For every increase of 1 in the CCI score, the relative risk of death was 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.36 to 1.74). CCI alone scored at the start of PD is a strong predictor of patient survival in incident end-stage renal disease patients on PD. This simple-to-calculate index would be useful to adjust for confounding in future studies and in the adjustment of case mix if Medicare moves to a capitated payment system.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

            Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) traditionally is assessed using Kt/V(urea) and total creatinine clearance (TCC). However, this approach underestimates the importance of fluid and sodium removal. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of fluid and sodium removal on morbidity and mortality in PD patients. One hundred twenty-five PD patients were monitored for three years from the beginning of the treatment. The effects of demographic features, comorbidity, peritonitis rate, blood pressure, medications, blood biochemistry, peritoneal membrane transport characteristics, residual renal function (RRF), Kt/V(urea), TCC, normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA), and removal of sodium and fluid on mortality were evaluated. Total and cardiovascular hospitalization rates were also recorded. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors predicting mortality. In the Cox model, comorbidity, total sodium and fluid removals, hypertensive status, serum creatinine, and RRF were independent factors affecting survival. In contrast, Kt/V(urea) or TCC did not affect the adjusted survivals. Total sodium and fluid removal and hypertensive status also significantly influenced the hospitalization rate. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were negatively correlated with total fluid (P < 0.001) and sodium removal (P < 0.001). Together, these findings suggest that removal of sodium and fluid is a predictor of mortality in PD patients, whereas Kt/V(urea) and TCC are not factors. Adequate fluid and sodium balance is crucial for the management of patients on PD.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Strong association between volume status and nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

              Malnutrition is a strong predictor of mortality in maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Various factors have been identified to contribute to the development of malnutrition. The present study tried to investigate the possible role of fluid overload in the development of malnutrition. Twenty-eight PD patients were included in this study. Fluid status was evaluated by means of repeated bioimpedance analysis, and nutritional status was assessed by means of handgrip strength and subjective global assessment. All patients were followed up closely for 9 months. Based on changes in bioimpedance analysis data, patients were divided into group A (with continuous and steadily improved fluid status; n = 18) and group B (with consistent fluid overload; n = 10). There were no differences in sex, age, and height between the 2 groups. In group A, patients' extracellular water (ECW) volume decreased significantly during follow-up, whereas intracellular water (ICW) volume increased significantly (both P < 0.001). In group B, ECW volume increased significantly, whereas ICW volume increased at an early stage and then decreased. The ratio of ECW to total-body water decreased significantly in group A, but increased significantly in group B. Along with the improvement in fluid status, nutritional status in group A also improved significantly (the prevalence of malnutrition decreased from 66.7% to 11.1%; P < 0.01). However, in group B, nutritional status deteriorated significantly (handgrip strength decreased from 238.33 +/- 88.93 to 216.1 +/- 86.19 N; P < 0.05; and the prevalence of malnutrition increased from 40% to 50%). Our data suggest there is a strong association between fluid status and nutritional status. Improved fluid status is associated with improvement in nutritional status, whereas deterioration in fluid status is associated with the development of malnutrition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2007
                July 2007
                12 April 2007
                : 25
                : 3
                : 260-266
                Affiliations
                aDivision of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, and bDivision of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China
                Article
                101699 Blood Purif 2007;25:260–266
                10.1159/000101699
                17429200
                2be384b2-4542-4ea8-9151-f45db2e36623
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 15 November 2006
                : 01 February 2007
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, References: 44, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Fluid status,Mortality,Peritoneal dialysis,Extracellular water,Intracellular water

                Comments

                Comment on this article