22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Grain for Green” driven land use change and carbon sequestration on the Loess Plateau, China

      research-article
      1 , 2 , a , 1 , 2 , 3
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Land-use change is widely considered to be a major factor affecting soil carbon (C) sequestration (ΔC s ). This paper studied changes to soil C stocks (C s ) following the conversion of farmland to forest, shrub and grassland across the key area for implementing China's “Grain for Green” — the Loess Plateau. The results are based on a synthesis of 44 recent publications (including 424 observations at 70 sites) which has allowed us to further refine our understanding of the mechanisms driving the increase in C s following farmland conversion. This synthesis suggests that the ΔC s potential of the Loess Plateau could reach 0.59 Tg yr −1 based on an estimated annual average ΔC s rate of 0.29 Mg ha −1 yr −1. In the region's different rainfall zones both the main contributing factors and C s dynamics varied. Across the entire Loess Plateau, C s showed first an increasing (<5 yr) then a decreasing (6–10 yr) tendency only to increase (>10 yr) yet again. In addition, the ΔC s rates depended primarily on restoration age. This synthesis demonstrates that both the initial s C s and the average annual temperature have a significant effect on ΔC s while the effect of land-use conversion type, rainfall zone, and average annual precipitation were minimal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998.

          The location and mechanisms responsible for the carbon sink in northern mid-latitude lands are uncertain. Here, we used an improved estimation method of forest biomass and a 50-year national forest resource inventory in China to estimate changes in the storage of living biomass between 1949 and 1998. Our results suggest that Chinese forests released about 0.68 petagram of carbon between 1949 and 1980, for an annual emission rate of 0.022 petagram of carbon. Carbon storage increased significantly after the late 1970s from 4.38 to 4.75 petagram of carbon by 1998, for a mean accumulation rate of 0.021 petagram of carbon per year, mainly due to forest expansion and regrowth. Since the mid-1970s, planted forests (afforestation and reforestation) have sequestered 0.45 petagram of carbon, and their average carbon density increased from 15.3 to 31.1 megagrams per hectare, while natural forests have lost an additional 0.14 petagram of carbon, suggesting that carbon sequestration through forest management practices addressed in the Kyoto Protocol could help offset industrial carbon dioxide emissions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications.

            Recent climate talks in Bali have made progress toward action on deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries, within the anticipated post-Kyoto emissions reduction agreements. As a result of such action, many forests will be better protected, but some land-use change will be displaced to other locations. The demonstration phase launched at Bali offers an opportunity to examine potential outcomes for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Research will be needed into selection of priority areas for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation to deliver multiple benefits, on-the-ground methods to best ensure these benefits, and minimization of displaced land-use change into nontarget countries and ecosystems, including through revised conservation investments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Soil carbon sequestration potential for "Grain for Green" project in Loess Plateau, China.

              Conversion of cropland into perennial vegetation land can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation, which might be an important mitigation measure to sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The "Grain for Green" project, one of the most ambitious ecological programmes launched in modern China, aims at transforming the low-yield slope cropland into grassland and woodland. The Loess Plateau in China is the most important target of this project due to its serious soil erosion. The objectives of this study are to answer three questions: (1) what is the rate of the SOC accumulation for this "Grain for Green" project in Loess Plateau? (2) Is there a difference in SOC sequestration among different restoration types, including grassland, shrub and forest? (3) Is the effect of restoration types on SOC accumulation different among northern, middle and southern regions of the Loess Plateau? Based on analysis of the data collected from the literature conducted in the Loess Plateau, we found that SOC increased at a rate of 0.712 TgC/year in the top 20 cm soil layer for 60 years under this project across the entire Loess Plateau. This was a relatively reliable estimation based on current data, although there were some uncertainties. Compared to grassland, forest had a significantly greater effect on SOC accumulation in middle and southern Loess Plateau but had a weaker effect in the northern Loess Plateau. There were no differences found in SOC sequestration between shrub and grassland across the entire Loess Plateau. Grassland had a stronger effect on SOC sequestration in the northern Loess Plateau than in the middle and southern regions. In contrast, forest could increase more SOC in the middle and southern Loess Plateau than in the northern Loess Plateau, whereas shrub had a similar effect on SOC sequestration across the Loess Plateau. Our results suggest that the "Grain for Green" project can significantly increase the SOC storage in Loess Plateau, and it is recommended to expand grassland and shrub areas in the northern Loess Plateau and forest in the middle and southern Loess Plateau to enhance the SOC sequestration in this area.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                13 November 2014
                2014
                : 4
                : 7039
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University , Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
                [2 ]Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources , Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
                [3 ]Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of the Bosphorus , Istanbul, Turkey
                Author notes
                Article
                srep07039
                10.1038/srep07039
                4229669
                25391219
                2c1c7773-90a8-4a74-b1a2-8ee452c83733
                Copyright © 2014, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 01 April 2014
                : 27 October 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article