15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advances in Precision Oncology: Targeted Thorium-227 Conjugates As a New Modality in Targeted Alpha Therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Targeted α therapy (TAT) offers the potential for the targeted delivery of potent α-particle-emitting radionuclides that emit high linear energy transfer radiation. This leads to a densely ionizing radiation track over a short path. Localized radiation induces cytotoxic, difficult-to-repair, clustered DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To date, radium-223 ( 223Ra) is the only TAT approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Thorium-227 ( 227Th), the progenitor nuclide of 223Ra, offers promise as a wider-ranging alternative due to the availability of efficient chelators, such as octadentate 3,2-hydroxypyridinone (3,2-HOPO). The 3,2-HOPO chelator can be readily conjugated to a range of targeting moieties, enabling the generation of new targeted thorium-227 conjugates (TTCs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the advances in the preclinical development of TTCs for hematological cancers, including CD22-positive B cell cancers and CD33-positive leukemia, as well as for solid tumors overexpressing renal cell cancer antigen CD70, membrane-anchored glycoprotein mesothelin in mesothelioma, prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2. As the mechanism of action for TTCs is linked to the formation of DSBs, the authors also report data supporting combinations of TTCs with inhibitors of the DNA damage response pathways, including those of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein, and poly-ADP ribose polymerase. Finally, emerging evidence suggests that TTCs induce immunogenic cell death through the release of danger-associated molecular patterns. Based on encouraging preclinical data, clinical studies have been initiated to investigate the safety and tolerability of TTCs in patients with various cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: a paradigm shift.

          The therapeutic application of ionizing radiation has been largely based on its cytocidal power combined with the ability to selectively target tumors. Radiotherapy effects on survival of cancer patients are generally interpreted as the consequence of improved local control of the tumor, directly decreasing systemic spread. Experimental data from multiple cancer models have provided sufficient evidence to propose a paradigm shift, whereby some of the effects of ionizing radiation are recognized as contributing to systemic antitumor immunity. Recent examples of objective responses achieved by adding radiotherapy to immunotherapy in metastatic cancer patients support this view. Therefore, the traditional palliative role of radiotherapy in metastatic disease is evolving into that of a powerful adjuvant for immunotherapy. This combination strategy adds to the current anticancer arsenal and offers opportunities to harness the immune system to extend survival, even among metastatic and heavily pretreated cancer patients. We briefly summarize key evidence supporting the role of radiotherapy as an immune adjuvant. A critical appraisal of the current status of knowledge must include potential immunosuppressive effects of radiation that can hamper its capacity to convert the irradiated tumor into an in situ, individualized vaccine. Moreover, we discuss some of the current challenges to translate this knowledge to the clinic as more trials testing radiation with different immunotherapies are proposed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer.

            Amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) occurs in approximately 10% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. However, it is uncertain whether overexpression of FGFR1 is causally linked to the poor prognosis of amplified cancers. Here, we show that FGFR1 overexpression is robustly associated with FGFR1 amplification in two independent series of breast cancers. Breast cancer cell lines with FGFR1 overexpression and amplification show enhanced ligand-dependent signaling, with increased activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling pathways in response to FGF2, but also show basal ligand-independent signaling, and are dependent on FGFR signaling for anchorage-independent growth. FGFR1-amplified cell lines show resistance to 4-hydroxytamoxifen, which is reversed by small interfering RNA silencing of FGFR1, suggesting that FGFR1 overexpression also promotes endocrine therapy resistance. FGFR1 signaling suppresses progesterone receptor (PR) expression in vitro, and likewise, amplified cancers are frequently PR negative, identifying a potential biomarker for FGFR1 activity. Furthermore, we show that amplified cancers have a high proliferative rate assessed by Ki67 staining and that FGFR1 amplification is found in 16% to 27% of luminal B-type breast cancers. Our data suggest that amplification and overexpression of FGFR1 may be a major contributor to poor prognosis in luminal-type breast cancers, driving anchorage-independent proliferation and endocrine therapy resistance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade

              Despite impressive durable responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not provide a long-term benefit to the majority of patients with cancer. Understanding genomic correlates of response and resistance to checkpoint blockade may enhance benefits for patients with cancer by elucidating biomarkers for patient stratification and resistance mechanisms for therapeutic targeting. Here we review emerging genomic markers of checkpoint blockade response, including those related to neoantigens, antigen presentation, DNA repair, and oncogenic pathways. Compelling evidence also points to a role for T cell functionality, checkpoint regulators, chromatin modifiers, and copy-number alterations in mediating selective response to immune checkpoint blockade. Ultimately, efforts to contextualize genomic correlates of response into the larger understanding of tumor immune biology will build a foundation for the development of novel biomarkers and therapies to overcome resistance to checkpoint blockade.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer Biother Radiopharm
                Cancer Biother. Radiopharm
                cbr
                Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals
                Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd FloorNew Rochelle, NY 10801USA )
                1084-9785
                1557-8852
                September 2020
                31 August 2020
                31 August 2020
                : 35
                : 7
                : 497-510
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
                [ 2 ]Bayer AS, Oslo, Norway.
                Author notes
                [*]Address correspondence to: Urs B. Hagemann; Bayer AG; Müllerstraße 178, Berlin 13353, Germany urs.hagemann@ 123456bayer.com
                Article
                10.1089/cbr.2020.3568
                10.1089/cbr.2020.3568
                7475103
                32255671
                2c1dbf21-49d2-4a5e-ab67-3295233c488b
                © Urs B. Hagemann et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

                This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 98, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Reviews

                conjugate,precision oncology,targeted alpha therapy,227th

                Comments

                Comment on this article