32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares

      We invite you to submit your manuscript to APA's open access journal, Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

      Learn more and submit.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Structures for Screens: Longitudinal Associations Between Parental Media Rules and Problematic Media Use in Early Childhood

      article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Media use is increasingly becoming an important facet of early childhood, and while professional organizations and researchers have attempted to present guidelines to parents to help them structure their children’s media use, many parents either are not aware of these guidelines or struggle to effectively implement them into their children’s daily routine. This research aimed to examine what rules parents of young children are implementing to structure their children’s media use and how specific media rules affect the development of children’s problematic media use (an early indicator of media dependence) longitudinally from ages 2 to 4 (three time points, each 1 year apart) in a sample of n = 435 children. We found that more parents have rules around their child’s TV use than tablet use when children are around age 2 1/2 years old, and that a sizable minority of parents ( n = 45; 10.30%) do not allow their child to use tablets at this same age. There was no relationship between media rules and problematic media use at Time 2. However, parents who did not allow their child to use tablets at Time 1 had lower levels of child problematic media use at Time 3, implying that the rules parents set around young children’s use of tablets and other personal media devices may be impactful in protecting children from the development of problematic media use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review.

          Electronic media have often been considered to have a negative impact on the sleep of children and adolescents, but there are no comprehensive reviews of research in this area. The present study identified 36 papers that have investigated the relationship between sleep and electronic media in school-aged children and adolescents, including television viewing, use of computers, electronic gaming, and/or the internet, mobile telephones, and music. Many variables have been investigated across these studies, although delayed bedtime and shorter total sleep time have been found to be most consistently related to media use. A model of the mechanisms by which media use may affect sleep is presented and discussed as a vehicle for future research. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Developmental Science in the 21st Century: Emerging Questions, Theoretical Models, Research Designs and Empirical Findings

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure.

              Grounded theory, as an evolving qualitative research method, is a product of its history as well as of its epistemology. Within the literature, there have been a number of discussions focusing on the differences between Glaser's (1978, 1992) and Strauss's (1987, 1990) versions of grounded theory. The purpose of this article is to add a level of depth and breadth to this discussion through specifically exploring the Glaser-Strauss debate by comparing the data analysis processes and procedures advocated by Glaser and by Strauss. To accomplish this task, the authors present the article in two sections. First, they provide relevant background information on grounded theory as a research method. Second, they pursue a more in-depth discussion of the positions of Glaser, using Glaser's work, and Strauss, using Strauss's and Strauss and Corbin's (1990) work, regarding the different phases of data analysis, specifically addressing the coding procedures, verification, and the issue of forcing versus emergence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Technology, Mind, and Behavior
                American Psychological Association
                2689-0208
                June 29, 2023
                : 3
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1]School of Family Life, Brigham Young University
                Author notes
                Special Collection Editors: Nick Bowman, Douglas A. Gentile, C. Shawn Green, and Tracy Markle
                Action Editor: C. Shawn Green was the action editor for this article.
                Jane Shawcroft is now at Department of Communication, University of California, Davis, 469 Kerr Hall, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
                Acknowledgments: The authors thank the School of Family Life, and the College of Family, Home, and Social Sciences at BYU, and recognize the generous support of the many private donors who provided assistance for this project. They also thank those families who were willing to spend valuable hours with our team and the many students who assisted.
                Funding: This project was funded in part by a grant from the National Institute of Health (R15HD101969 to Sarah M. Coyne).
                Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to share.
                Data Availability: Syntax is available upon request from the corresponding author.
                [*] Jane Shawcroft, Department of Communication, University of California, Davis, 469 Kerr Hall, Davis, CA 95616, United States jestephens@ucdavis.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-6805
                Article
                10.1037/tmb0000104
                2c28c8bd-2176-4f92-9f36-fd6124ec24dc
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.

                History
                Categories
                Behavioral Addiction to Technology

                Education,Psychology,Vocational technology,Engineering,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                restrictive media monitoring,media parenting,child problematic media use

                Comments

                Comment on this article