6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study.

      Annals of Surgery
      Adult, Aged, Bile Duct Diseases, etiology, Bile Ducts, injuries, Case-Control Studies, Cholecystectomy, adverse effects, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Questionnaires

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To compare quality of life (QOL) of patients following iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) to matched controls. BDI complicate approximately 0.3% of all cholecystectomy procedures. The literature regarding impact on quality of life is conflicted as assessment using clinical determinants alone is insufficient. The medical outcomes study short form 36 (SF-36), a sensitive tool for quantification of life quality outcome, was used. The study group of iatrogenic BDI was compared with an age- and sex-matched group who underwent uncomplicated cholecystectomy. Telephone questionnaire using the SF-36 quality of life tool was administered to both groups at a median postoperative time of 12 years 8 months (range, 2 months -20 years). Seventy-eight patients were referred with BDI but due to mortality (n = 10) and unavailability (n = 6) 62 participated. The age- and sex-matched control cohort had undergone uncomplicated cholecystectomy (n = 62). Comparison between groups revealed that 7 of 8 variables examined were statistically similar to those of the control group (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality and social functioning, and mental health index). Mean role emotional scores were slightly worse in the BDI group (46 vs. 50) but the significance was borderline (P = 0.045). Subgroup analysis by method of intervention for BDI did not demonstrate significant differences. Quality of life of surviving patients following BDI compares favorably to that after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article