16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Why publish your research Open Access with G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics?

      Learn more and submit today!

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of the Potential for Genomic Selection To Improve Husk Traits in Maize

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Husk has multiple functions such as protecting ears from diseases, infection, and dehydration during development. Additionally, husks comprised of fewer, shorter, thinner, and narrower layers allow faster moisture evaporation of kernels prior to harvest. Intensive studies have been conducted to identify appropriate husk architecture by understanding the genetic basis of related traits, including husk length, husk layer number, husk thickness, and husk width. However, marker-assisted selection is inefficient because the identified quantitative trait loci and associated genetic loci could only explain a small proportion of total phenotypic variation. Genomic selection (GS) has been used successfully on many species including maize on other traits. Thus, the potential of using GS for husk traits to directly identify superior inbred lines, without knowing the specific underlying genetic loci, is well worth exploring. In this study, we compared four GS models on a maize association population with 498 inbred lines belonging to four subpopulations, including 27 lines in stiff stalk, 67 lines in non-stiff stalk, 193 lines in tropical-subtropical, and 211 lines in mixture subpopulations. Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction with principal components as cofactor, performed the best and was selected to examine the impact of interaction between sampling proportions and subpopulations. We found that predictions on inbred lines in a subpopulation were benefited from excluding individuals from other subpopulations for training if the training population within the subpopulation was large enough. Husk thickness exhibited the highest prediction accuracy among all husk traits. These results gave strategic insight to improve husk architecture.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

          Efficient methods for processing genomic data were developed to increase reliability of estimated breeding values and to estimate thousands of marker effects simultaneously. Algorithms were derived and computer programs tested with simulated data for 2,967 bulls and 50,000 markers distributed randomly across 30 chromosomes. Estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients required accurate estimates of allele frequencies in the base population. Linear model predictions of breeding values were computed by 3 equivalent methods: 1) iteration for individual allele effects followed by summation across loci to obtain estimated breeding values, 2) selection index including a genomic relationship matrix, and 3) mixed model equations including the inverse of genomic relationships. A blend of first- and second-order Jacobi iteration using 2 separate relaxation factors converged well for allele frequencies and effects. Reliability of predicted net merit for young bulls was 63% compared with 32% using the traditional relationship matrix. Nonlinear predictions were also computed using iteration on data and nonlinear regression on marker deviations; an additional (about 3%) gain in reliability for young bulls increased average reliability to 66%. Computing times increased linearly with number of genotypes. Estimation of allele frequencies required 2 processor days, and genomic predictions required <1 d per trait, and traits were processed in parallel. Information from genotyping was equivalent to about 20 daughters with phenotypic records. Actual gains may differ because the simulation did not account for linkage disequilibrium in the base population or selection in subsequent generations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future

            In the last two years the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org) has undergone a substantial reorganisation to reduce the effort involved in making a release, thereby permitting more frequent releases. Arguably the most significant of these changes is that Pfam is now primarily based on the UniProtKB reference proteomes, with the counts of matched sequences and species reported on the website restricted to this smaller set. Building families on reference proteomes sequences brings greater stability, which decreases the amount of manual curation required to maintain them. It also reduces the number of sequences displayed on the website, whilst still providing access to many important model organisms. Matches to the full UniProtKB database are, however, still available and Pfam annotations for individual UniProtKB sequences can still be retrieved. Some Pfam entries (1.6%) which have no matches to reference proteomes remain; we are working with UniProt to see if sequences from them can be incorporated into reference proteomes. Pfam-B, the automatically-generated supplement to Pfam, has been removed. The current release (Pfam 29.0) includes 16 295 entries and 559 clans. The facility to view the relationship between families within a clan has been improved by the introduction of a new tool.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.

              Whole-genome association studies present many new statistical and computational challenges due to the large quantity of data obtained. One of these challenges is haplotype inference; methods for haplotype inference designed for small data sets from candidate-gene studies do not scale well to the large number of individuals genotyped in whole-genome association studies. We present a new method and software for inference of haplotype phase and missing data that can accurately phase data from whole-genome association studies, and we present the first comparison of haplotype-inference methods for real and simulated data sets with thousands of genotyped individuals. We find that our method outperforms existing methods in terms of both speed and accuracy for large data sets with thousands of individuals and densely spaced genetic markers, and we use our method to phase a real data set of 3,002 individuals genotyped for 490,032 markers in 3.1 days of computing time, with 99% of masked alleles imputed correctly. Our method is implemented in the Beagle software package, which is freely available.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                G3 (Bethesda)
                Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                2160-1836
                14 August 2020
                October 2020
                : 10
                : 10
                : 3741-3749
                Affiliations
                [* ]College of Biological Science and Technology, Liaoning Province Research Center of Plant Genetic Engineering Technology, Shenyang Key Laboratory of Maize Genomic Selection Breeding, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
                []Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
                []College of Plant Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
                [§ ]National Maize Improvement Center of China, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100094, China
                Author notes
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [2 ]Corresponding author: E-mails: yh352@ 123456cau.edu.cn ; zhiwu.zhang@ 123456wsu.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-9456
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1757-488X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-2181
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-8502
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-9684
                Article
                GGG_401600
                10.1534/g3.120.401600
                7534435
                32816916
                2c59f7f2-1b5f-414d-a8ad-8c4d7fa93dc5
                Copyright © 2020 Cui et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 February 2020
                : 05 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 1, References: 60, Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 31771880
                Award ID: 2019-ZD-0723
                Award ID: 2016-68004-24770, 2018-70005-28792, and 2019-67013-29171
                Funded by: National Science Foundation, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001;
                Award ID: DBI 1661348
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 31901434
                Award ID: 126593
                Award ID: 134574
                Categories
                Genomic Prediction

                Genetics
                genomic selection,husk,population structure,prediction accuracy,maize,gblup,marker assisted selection,breeding,rrblup,gapit,genpred,genomic,prediction,shared data resources

                Comments

                Comment on this article