Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Trends and factors associated with infant bed sharing, 1993-2010: the National Infant Sleep Position Study.

JAMA pediatrics

Attitude of Health Personnel, Beds, Health Care Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant Care, trends, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk-Taking, Sleep, Socioeconomic Factors

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      A strong association between infant bed sharing and sudden infant death syndrome or unintentional sleep-related death in infants has been established. Occurrences of unintentional sleep-related deaths among infants appear to be increasing. To determine the trends and factors associated with infant bed sharing from 1993 through 2010, including the association of physician advice on bed sharing. National Infant Sleep Position study conducted with annual telephone surveys. The 48 contiguous states. Nighttime caregivers of infants born within 7 months of each survey administration. Approximately 1000 interviews were completed annually. Infant bed sharing as a usual practice. Of 18 986 participants, 11.2% reported an infant sharing a bed as a usual practice. Bed sharing increased from 1993 (6.5%) to 2010 (13.5%). Although bed sharing increased significantly among white respondents from 1993 to 2000 (P < .001), the increase from 2001 to 2010 was not significant (P = .48). Black and Hispanic respondents reported an increase in bed sharing throughout the study period, with no difference between the earlier and later periods (P = .63 and P = .77, respectively). After accounting for the study year, factors associated with increase in infant bed sharing as a usual practice included maternal educational level of less than high school compared with college or greater (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.12-1.79]); black (3.47 [2.97-4.05]), Hispanic (1.33 [1.10-1.61]), and other (2.46 [2.03-2.97]) maternal race or ethnicity compared with white race; household income of less than $20,000 (1.69 [1.44-1.99]) and $20,000 to $50,000 (1.29 [1.14-1.45]) compared with greater than $50,000; living in the West (1.61 [1.38-1.88]) or the South (1.47 [1.30-1.66]) compared with the Midwest; infants younger than 8 weeks (1.45 [1.21-1.73]) or ages 8 to 15 weeks (1.31 [1.17-1.45]) compared with 16 weeks or older; and being born prematurely compared with full-term (1.41 [1.22-1.62]). Almost 46% of the participants reported talking to a physician about bed sharing. Compared with those who did not receive advice from a physician, those who reported their physicians had a negative attitude were less likely to have the infant share a bed (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82]), whereas a neutral attitude was associated with increased bed sharing (1.38 [1.05-1.80]). Our finding of a continual increase in bed sharing throughout the study period among black and Hispanic infants suggests that the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation about bed sharing is not universally followed. The factors associated with infant bed sharing may be useful in evaluating the impact of a broad intervention to change behavior.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      24080961
      10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2560
      3903787

      Comments

      Comment on this article