20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Hydralazine and Labetalol to lower severe hypertension in pregnancy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To compare the intravenous Labetalol versus intravenous hydralazine in patients having severe Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and pre eclampsia (PE) in pregnancy.

          Methods:

          Seventy eight women admitted in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Civil Hospital Karachi, having severe PIH/PE and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Random selection of patients was performed using sealed opaqe envelop for administration of either intravenous noted (IV) Labetalol or Hydrallazine. The mean fall in the MAP in each group was noted. This data was analyzed by applying SPSS version 13. The study was conducted from November 2012 to April 2013.

          Results:

          The mean (±SD) age of the labetalol group was 27.46 (±5.28) years while that in the hydralazine group was 26.28 (±5.17) years. The mean fall in MAP observed in the labetalol group was 29.10 ± 7.21 mmHg and that in the hydralazine group was 25.05 ± 10.15 mmHg which was statistically significant with the p value being 0.046.

          Conclusion:

          Intra Venous labetalol lowered MAP more than hydralazine, when administered to pregnant females with severe Pregnancy induced hypertension and pre eclampsia in pregnancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Stroke and severe preeclampsia and eclampsia: a paradigm shift focusing on systolic blood pressure.

          To identify important clinical correlates of stroke in patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia. The case histories of 28 patients who sustained a stroke in association with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia were scrutinized with particular attention to blood pressures. Stroke occurred antepartum in 12 patients, postpartum in 16. Stroke was classified as hemorrhagic-arterial in 25 of 27 patients (92.6%) and thrombotic-arterial in 2 others. Multiple sites were involved in 37% without distinct pattern. In the 24 patients being treated immediately before stroke, systolic pressure was 160 mm Hg or greater in 23 (95.8%) and more than 155 mm Hg in 100%. In contrast, only 3 of 24 patients (12.5%) exhibited prestroke diastolic pressures of 110 mm Hg or greater, only 5 of 28 reached 105 mm Hg, and only 6 (25%) exceeded a mean arterial pressure of 130 mm Hg before stroke. Only 3 patients received prestroke antihypertensives. Twelve patients sustained a stroke while receiving magnesium sulfate infusion; 8 had eclampsia. Although all blood pressure means after stroke were significantly higher than prestroke, only 5 patients exhibited more than 110 mm Hg diastolic pressures. In 18 of 28 patients, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome did not significantly alter blood pressures compared with non-hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets. Mean systolic and diastolic changes from pregnancy baseline to prestroke values were 64.4 and 30.6 mm Hg, respectively. Maternal mortality was 53.6%; only 3 patients escaped permanent significant morbidity. In contrast to severe systolic hypertension, severe diastolic hypertension does not develop before stroke in most patients with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia. A paradigm shift is needed toward considering antihypertensive therapy for severely preeclamptic and eclamptic patients when systolic blood pressure reaches or exceeds 155-160 mm Hg. III.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention Study Group.

            To determine maternal and perinatal outcomes in nulliparas with pregnancy-associated hypertension or preeclampsia. We conducted (and reported elsewhere) a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial calcium supplementation of 4589 healthy nulliparas assigned at 13-21 weeks' gestation. This well-defined and characterized data set provided an opportunity to detail more precisely adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes in women who developed hypertension among a prospective series of healthy nulliparas. Of 4302 women observed to or beyond 20 weeks' gestation, 1073 (24.9%) developed mild or severe pregnancy-associated hypertension or preeclampsia. One hundred sixteen women of the 1073 with hypertension (10.8%) and 336 of the 3229 without hypertension (10.4%) were delivered before 37 weeks' gestation. Fetal and neonatal mortality were similar in those groups; however, selected maternal and newborn morbidities were significantly greater in women with hypertension. Significantly increased maternal morbidities included increased cesarean deliveries, abruptio placentae, and acute renal dysfunction; and significantly increased perinatal morbidities included respiratory distress syndrome, ventilatory support, and fetal growth restriction. Adverse outcomes were highest in women with severe pregnancy-associated hypertension or preeclampsia. Hypertension, especially severe hypertension, was associated with an appreciable increase in important maternal and perinatal morbidity but not perinatal mortality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How to manage hypertension in pregnancy effectively.

              The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in both well and under-resourced settings. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications of the HDP are concentrated among, but not limited to, women with pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia is a systemic disorder of endothelial cell dysfunction and as such, blood pressure (BP) treatment is but one aspect of its management. The most appropriate BP threshold and goal of antihypertensive treatment are controversial. Variation between international guidelines has more to do with differences in opinion rather than differences in published data. For women with severe hypertension [defined as a sustained systolic BP (sBP) of ≥160 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP (dBP) of ≥110 mmHg], there is consensus that antihypertensive therapy should be given to lower the maternal risk of central nervous system complications. The bulk of the evidence relates to parenteral hydralazine and labetalol, or to oral calcium channel blockers such as nifedipine capsules. There is, however, no consensus regarding management of non-severe hypertension (defined as a sBP of 140-159 mmHg or a dBP of 90-109 mmHg), because the relevant randomized trials have been underpowered to define the maternal and perinatal benefits and risks. Although antihypertensive therapy may decrease the occurrence of BP values of 160-170/100-110 mmHg, therapy may also impair fetal growth. The potential benefits and risks do not seem to be associated with any particular drug or drug class. Oral labetalol and methyldopa are used most commonly, but many different β-adrenoceptor blockers and calcium channel blockers have been studied in clinical trials. © 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
                Professional Medical Publications (Pakistan )
                1682-024X
                1681-715X
                Mar-Apr 2017
                : 33
                : 2
                : 466-470
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Prof. Ayesha Khan, FRCOG. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Dr. Sajida Hafeez, FCPS. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                [3 ]Dr. Farah Deeba Nasrullah, FCPS. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Prof. Ayesha Khan, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. E-mail: profayesha@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                PJMS-33-466
                10.12669/pjms.332.12243
                5432725
                28523058
                2c735086-204c-4d07-bed6-217f2789baad
                Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 December 2016
                : 30 December 2016
                : 31 March 2017
                : 01 April 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                hydralazine,labetalol,mean arterial pressures,pregnancy induced hypertension

                Comments

                Comment on this article