4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The effect of prior knowledge and intelligibility on the cortical entrainment response to speech

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neural oscillations have been implicated in the parsing of speech into discrete, hierarchically organized units. Our data suggest that these oscillations track the acoustic envelope rather than more abstract linguistic properties of the speech stimulus. Our data also suggest that prior experience with the stimulus allows these oscillations to better track the stimulus envelope.

          Abstract

          It has been suggested that cortical entrainment plays an important role in speech perception by helping to parse the acoustic stimulus into discrete linguistic units. However, the question of whether the entrainment response to speech depends on the intelligibility of the stimulus remains open. Studies addressing this question of intelligibility have, for the most part, significantly distorted the acoustic properties of the stimulus to degrade the intelligibility of the speech stimulus, making it difficult to compare across “intelligible” and “unintelligible” conditions. To avoid these acoustic confounds, we used priming to manipulate the intelligibility of vocoded speech. We used EEG to measure the entrainment response to vocoded target sentences that are preceded by natural speech (nonvocoded) prime sentences that are either valid (match the target) or invalid (do not match the target). For unintelligible speech, valid primes have the effect of restoring intelligibility. We compared the effect of priming on the entrainment response for both 3-channel (unintelligible) and 16-channel (intelligible) speech. We observed a main effect of priming, suggesting that the entrainment response depends on prior knowledge, but not a main effect of vocoding (16 channels vs. 3 channels). Furthermore, we found no difference in the effect of priming on the entrainment response to 3-channel and 16-channel vocoded speech, suggesting that for vocoded speech, entrainment response does not depend on intelligibility.

          NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neural oscillations have been implicated in the parsing of speech into discrete, hierarchically organized units. Our data suggest that these oscillations track the acoustic envelope rather than more abstract linguistic properties of the speech stimulus. Our data also suggest that prior experience with the stimulus allows these oscillations to better track the stimulus envelope.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Neurophysiol
          J. Neurophysiol
          jn
          jn
          JN
          Journal of Neurophysiology
          American Physiological Society (Bethesda, MD )
          0022-3077
          1522-1598
          1 December 2017
          6 September 2017
          1 December 2018
          : 118
          : 6
          : 3144-3151
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California , Irvine, California; and
          [2] 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California , Irvine, California
          Author notes
          Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. S. Baltzell, Social Science Lab (SSL) 184, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697 (e-mail: baltzell@ 123456uci.edu ).
          Article
          PMC5814715 PMC5814715 5814715 JN-00023-2017 JN-00023-2017
          10.1152/jn.00023.2017
          5814715
          28877963
          2c979462-41ef-42fa-b8c4-843b9ebec6fa
          Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society
          History
          : 10 January 2017
          : 1 September 2017
          : 1 September 2017
          Funding
          Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002 HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
          Award ID: R21 DC013406
          Award ID: T32 DC010775
          Categories
          Research Article
          Sensory Processing

          prior knowledge,intelligibility,entrainment,EEG,attention
          prior knowledge, intelligibility, entrainment, EEG, attention

          Comments

          Comment on this article