29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phylogeography of Aegean green toads ( Bufo viridis subgroup): continental hybrid swarm vs. insular diversification with discovery of a new island endemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Debated aspects in speciation research concern the amount of gene flow between incipient species under secondary contact and the modes by which post-zygotic isolation accumulates. Secondary contact zones of allopatric lineages, involving varying levels of divergence, provide natural settings for comparative studies, for which the Aegean (Eastern Mediterranean) geography offers unique scenarios. In Palearctic green toads ( Bufo viridis subgroup or Bufotes), Plio-Pleistocene (~ 2.6 Mya) diverged species show a sharp transition without contemporary gene flow, while younger lineages, diverged in the Lower-Pleistocene (~ 1.9 Mya), admix over tens of kilometers. Here, we conducted a fine-scale multilocus phylogeographic analysis of continental and insular green toads from the Aegean, where a third pair of taxa, involving Mid-Pleistocene diverged (~ 1.5 Mya) mitochondrial lineages, earlier tentatively named viridis and variabilis, (co-)occurs.

          Results

          We discovered a new lineage, endemic to Naxos (Central Cyclades), while coastal islands and Crete feature weak genetic differentiation from the continent. In continental Greece, both lineages, viridis and variabilis, form a hybrid swarm, involving massive mitochondrial and nuclear admixture over hundreds of kilometers, without obvious selection against hybrids.

          Conclusions

          The genetic signatures of insular Aegean toads appear governed by bathymetry and Quaternary sea level changes, resulting in long-term isolation (Central Cyclades: Naxos) and recent land-bridges (coastal islands). Conversely, Crete has been isolated since the end of the Messinian salinity crisis (5.3 My) and Cretan populations thus likely result from human-mediated colonization, at least since Antiquity, from Peloponnese and Anatolia. Comparisons of green toad hybrid zones support the idea that post-zygotic hybrid incompatibilities accumulate gradually over the genome. In this radiation, only one million years of divergence separate a scenario of complete reproductive isolation, from a secondary contact resulting in near panmixia.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12862-018-1179-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The hellenic arc and trench system: A key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern mediterranean area

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interpreting the genomic landscape of speciation: a road map for finding barriers to gene flow

            Speciation, the evolution of reproductive isolation among populations, is continuous, complex, and involves multiple, interacting barriers. Until it is complete, the effects of this process vary along the genome and can lead to a heterogeneous genomic landscape with peaks and troughs of differentiation and divergence. When gene flow occurs during speciation, barriers restricting gene flow locally in the genome lead to patterns of heterogeneity. However, genomic heterogeneity can also be produced or modified by variation in factors such as background selection and selective sweeps, recombination and mutation rate variation, and heterogeneous gene density. Extracting the effects of gene flow, divergent selection and reproductive isolation from such modifying factors presents a major challenge to speciation genomics. We argue one of the principal aims of the field is to identify the barrier loci involved in limiting gene flow. We first summarize the expected signatures of selection at barrier loci, at the genomic regions linked to them and across the entire genome. We then discuss the modifying factors that complicate the interpretation of the observed genomic landscape. Finally, we end with a road map for future speciation research: a proposal for how to account for these modifying factors and to progress towards understanding the nature of barrier loci. Despite the difficulties of interpreting empirical data, we argue that the availability of promising technical and analytical methods will shed further light on the important roles that gene flow and divergent selection have in shaping the genomic landscape of speciation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Speciation by reinforcement.

              R Butlin (1987)
              Speciation has a central place in evolution, linking genetic processes within populations to the generation of biological diversity. The formation of new species must involve the evolution of barriers to gene flow within existing species, but how these barriers arise remains a problem. In the case of prezygotic isolation it is possible that natural selection directly favours characters that decrease gene flow. Where two populations have diverged to such an extent that they produce unfit hybrids, individuals will leave more offspring if they mate within their own population. Characters increasing assortive mating will be favoured until eventually two species may result. This is the widely accepted model of speciation by reinforcement. However, recent studies suggest serious limitations on the efficacy of reinforcing selection and a lack of well-substantiated examples. Copyright © 1987. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                christophe.dufresnes@unil.ch
                lyberis@nhmc.uoc.gr
                korniliospan@yahoo.gr
                romain.savary@unil.ch
                nicolas.perrin@unil.ch
                +49 30 64 181 629 , matthias.stoeck@igb-berlin.de
                Journal
                BMC Evol Biol
                BMC Evol. Biol
                BMC Evolutionary Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2148
                2 May 2018
                2 May 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 67
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2165 4204, GRID grid.9851.5, Department of Ecology & Evolution, , University of Lausanne, ; Biophore Building, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, GRID grid.11835.3e, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, , University of Sheffield, ; Alfred Denny Building, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0576 3437, GRID grid.8127.c, Natural History Museum of Crete, , University of Crete, ; Knosos Av, P.O. Box 2208, 71409 Irakleio, Crete Greece
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0576 5395, GRID grid.11047.33, Section of Animal Biology, Department of Biology, School of Natural Sciences, , University of Patras, ; GR-26500 Patras, Greece
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Department of Biology, , University of Washington, ; Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195-1800 USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2108 8097, GRID grid.419247.d, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), ; Müggelseedamm 301, D-12587 Berlin, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-8371
                Article
                1179
                10.1186/s12862-018-1179-0
                5930823
                29720079
                2cd8cd24-3fd0-4153-a054-36dc28a097d8
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 September 2017
                : 16 April 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: STO 493/2-2
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung;
                Award ID: P2LAP3_171818
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article