18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Alterations in maternally perceived fetal movement and their association with late stillbirth: findings from the Midland and North of England stillbirth case–control study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To report perception of fetal movements in women who experienced a stillbirth compared with controls at a similar gestation with a live birth.

          Design

          Case–control study.

          Setting

          41 maternity units in the UK.

          Participants

          Cases were women who had a late stillbirth ≥28 weeks gestation (n=291) and controls were women with an ongoing pregnancy at the time of the interview (n=733). Controls were frequency matched to cases by obstetric unit and gestational age.

          Methods

          Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions on maternal perception of fetal movement (frequency, strength, increased and decreased movements and hiccups) in the 2 weeks before the interview/stillbirth. Five fetal movement patterns were identified incorporating the changes in strength and frequency in the last 2 weeks by combining groups of similar pattern and risk. Multivariable analysis adjusted for known confounders.

          Primary outcome measure

          Association of maternally perceived fetal movements in relation to late stillbirth.

          Results

          In multivariable analyses, women who reported increased strength of movements in the last 2 weeks had decreased risk of late stillbirth compared with those whose movements were unchanged (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.26). Women with decreased frequency (without increase in strength) of fetal movements were at increased risk (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.38 to 8.55). Daily perception of fetal hiccups was protective (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.56).

          Conclusions

          Increased strength of fetal movements and fetal hiccups is associated with decreased risk of stillbirth. Alterations in frequency of fetal movements are important in identifying pregnancies at increased risk of stillbirth, with the greatest risk in women noting a reduction in fetal activity. Clinical guidance should be updated to reflect that increase in strength and frequency of fetal movements is associated with the lowest risk of stillbirth, and that decreased fetal movements are associated with stillbirth.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02025530.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study.

          To develop and test a new classification system for stillbirths to help improve understanding of the main causes and conditions associated with fetal death. Population based cohort study. West Midlands region. 2625 stillbirths from 1997 to 2003. Categories of death according to conventional classification methods and a newly developed system (ReCoDe, relevant condition at death). By the conventional Wigglesworth classification, 66.2% of the stillbirths (1738 of 2625) were unexplained. The median gestational age of the unexplained group was 237 days, significantly higher than the stillbirths in the other categories (210 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of stillbirths that were unexplained was high regardless of whether a postmortem examination had been carried out or not (67% and 65%; P = 0.3). By the ReCoDe classification, the most common condition was fetal growth restriction (43.0%), and only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained. ReCoDe identified 57.7% of the Wigglesworth unexplained stillbirths as growth restricted. The size of the category for intrapartum asphyxia was reduced from 11.7% (Wigglesworth) to 3.4% (ReCoDe). The new ReCoDe classification system reduces the predominance of stillbirths currently categorised as unexplained. Fetal growth restriction is a common antecedent of stillbirth, but its high prevalence is hidden by current classification systems. This finding has profound implications for maternity services, and raises the question whether some hitherto "unexplained" stillbirths may be avoidable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise.

              Maternal perception of fetal movements is widely used as a marker of fetal viability and well-being. A reduction in fetal movements is associated with fetal hypoxia, increased incidence of stillbirth and fetal growth restriction (FGR). Therefore, a reduction in fetal movements has been proposed as a screening tool for FGR or fetal compromise. The problem of this approach is that there is no widely accepted definition of reduced fetal activity or 'alarm limits', and pregnant women are currently given a wide range of non-evidence-based advice. We have reviewed the background of published definitions and their potential usefulness in screening. A formal meta-analysis of these studies is not possible due to variation in methodology and definitions of reduced fetal movements. Assessment of fetal movements using formal fetal movement counting has shown equivocal results. Importantly, in all studies, there was a decrease in perinatal mortality suggesting a beneficial role for raising maternal awareness of fetal movements. Most studies implemented limits to define reduced fetal movements based on small groups of high risk pregnancies and obsolete counting methodology. A single case-control study developed 'normal limits' in a low risk population, and successfully implemented it prospectively for screening. At present, there is no evidence that any absolute definition of reduced fetal movements is of greater value than maternal subjective perception of reduced fetal movements in the detection of intrauterine fetal death or fetal compromise. Further investigation is required to determine an effective method of identifying patients with reduced fetal movements and to determine the best subsequent management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                6 July 2018
                : 8
                : 7
                : e020031
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biological, Medical and Human Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester, UK
                [2 ] departmentManchester Academic Health Science Centre , St. Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, UK
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Paediatrics, Child Health and Youth Health , University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand
                [5 ] departmentSchool of Healthcare , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics , Birmingham Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics , Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust , Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Liverpool, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Alexander E P Heazell; alexander.heazell@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3095-7490
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-020031
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020031
                6042603
                29982198
                2cdd41ed-fc30-4413-845e-eb5b4673acaf
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 10 October 2017
                : 10 May 2018
                : 25 May 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000317, Action Medical Research;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011243, Stillborn and Neonatal Death Charity;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001515, Cure Kids;
                Categories
                Obstetrics and Gynaecology
                Research
                1506
                1609
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                maternal perception,fetal movement,reduced fetal movement,exaggerated fetal movement,stillbirth,risk factor

                Comments

                Comment on this article