4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and Safety of Locoregional Radiotherapy With Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone in De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma : A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 9 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 10 , 2 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 1 , 2 , 3
      JAMA Oncology
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients?

          To compare the results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with those of two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT) in the treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A retrospective review of data from 1,276 patients with biopsy-proven, nonmetastatic NPC was performed. All patients had undergone magnetic resonance imaging and were staged according to the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria. Radiotherapy was the primary treatment for all patients. Of the 1,276 patients, 512 were treated with IMRT and 764 with 2D-CRT. The 5-year actuarial local relapse-free survival (LRFS), the nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS), the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 92.7%, 97.0%, 84.0%, and 75.9%, respectively, for the IMRT group, and 86.8%, 95.5%, 82.6%, and 71.4%, respectively, for the 2D-CRT group. In stage T1 patients, improvement of LRFS in the IMRT group was even significantly higher than in the 2D-CRT group (100% vs. 94.4%; p = 0.016). A trend of improvement of DFS was observed in the IMRT group compared with the 2D-CRT group but without reaching statistical significance. NRFS and DMFS rates were similar in the two groups. A greater improvement of treatment results with IMRT than with 2D-CRT was demonstrated primarily by achieving a higher local tumor control rate in NPC patients, especially in the early T stage patients. The goal of better control of both local failure in advanced, nonmetastatic NPC patients and of distant failure should be addressed in future studies. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The prevalence and prevention of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China

            Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has remarkable epidemiological features, including regional, racial, and familial aggregations. The aim of this review is to describe the epidemiological characteristics of NPC and to propose possible causes for the high incidence patterns in southern China. Since the etiology of NPC is not completely understood, approaches to primary prevention of NPC remain under consideration. This situation highlights the need to conduct secondary prevention, including improving rates of early detection, early diagnosis, and early treatment in NPC patients. Since the 1970's, high-risk populations in southern China have been screened extensively for early detection of NPC using anti–Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serum biomarkers. This review summarizes several large screening studies that have been conducted in the high-incidence areas of China. Screening markers, high-risk age range for screening, time intervals for blood re-examination, and the effectiveness of these screening studies will be discussed. Conduction of prospective randomized controlled screening trials in southern China can be expected to maximize the cost-effectiveness of early NPC detection screening.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Local control, survival, and late toxicities of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy: long-term results of a phase 2 study.

              The aim of this phase 2 study was to determine the long-term local control, survival, and late toxicities among patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) boost technique and concurrent chemotherapy. Eighty-one patients with pathologically diagnosed locally advanced NPC were enrolled in this study. IMRT was delivered with the SMART boost technique at prescribed doses of 68 grays (Gy)/30 fraction to the nasopharynx gross target volume. Concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (80 mg/m(2) /d on Days 1 and 22) was administered. The mean actual physical dose delivered to the nasopharynx gross target volume was 73.8 Gy, and the mean biologically effective dose (BED) for the nasopharynx gross target volume was 84.8 Gy. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 4 (4.9%) patients experienced local recurrence. The 5-year local control rate was 94.9%. Eighteen patients died. Among them, 66.7% died of distant metastasis. The 5-year disease-free and overall survivals were 76.7% and 74.5%, respectively. The most common late toxicities among 68 patients with ≥4 years follow-up were grade 1-2 xerostomia, hearing loss, skin dystrophy, and subcutaneous fibrosis. No grade 4 late toxicities were noted. IMRT with SMART to enhance BED and concurrent chemotherapy is feasible in patients with locally advanced NPC. Long-term results showed excellent local control with fewer late toxicities, although no further improvement was noted in overall survival, and the major cause of death was distant metastasis. Exploration of more effective combined chemoradiation strategies is warranted. Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncology
                JAMA Oncol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2374-2437
                July 23 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
                [2 ]Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine
                [3 ]Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
                [4 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
                [5 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
                [6 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou 510080, China
                [7 ]Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
                [8 ]Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
                [9 ]Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
                [10 ]Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
                [11 ]Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
                [12 ]Division of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 169610, Singapore
                [13 ]Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857, Singapore
                Article
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1808
                32701129
                2cf0a2da-a19d-47ac-a9ef-b202010fc30b
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article