Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Black-White Comparisons of 20-Year Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in the Evans County Heart Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Evans County Heart Study was initiated to compare the epidemiology of coronary heart disease (CHD) of black and white residents of a southeastern United States community. The study was prompted by a clinical observation that CHD appeared to be less frequent in black than white patients, despite a much higher prevalence and greater severity of hypertension in blacks. A total community-based, closed cohort study was initiated with a prevalence survey in 1960-1962. The 20-year follow-up experience of the Evans County cohort confirmed the importance of the major risk factors of serum cholesterol, smoking and blood pressure for middle age and older, black and white men and women for CHD, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Black men were less likely to die of CHD than white men, and this relative protectiveness increased upon adjusting for risk factors and also increased with age. The relative protectiveness of black men for CHD mortality was also reflected in lower black than white CVD and all-cause mortality in men 65 years of age and older.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CRD
          Cardiology
          10.1159/issn.0008-6312
          Cardiology
          S. Karger AG
          978-3-8055-5790-0
          978-3-318-01585-0
          0008-6312
          1421-9751
          1993
          1993
          14 November 2008
          : 82
          : 2-3
          : 122-136
          Affiliations
          aEvans County Heart Research, Claxton, Ga., USA, and Departments of bEpidemiology and cBiostatistics, UNC, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
          Article
          175863 Cardiology 1993;82:122–136
          10.1159/000175863
          8324775
          © 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 15
          Categories
          Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article