+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predilution versus postdilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration: no effect on filter life and azotemic control in critically ill patients on heparin.

      ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
      Acute Kidney Injury, blood, therapy, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, administration & dosage, therapeutic use, Azotemia, Creatinine, Critical Illness, Hemofiltration, instrumentation, methods, Heparin, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Urea

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          In continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), the delivery of replacement fluid in pre- or postdilution mode remains the subject of controversy. We compared both modes in terms of filter life, dose, and azotemic control. All patients admitted to the intensive care units of a university hospital between November 2004 and December 2006 receiving CVVH and systemic anticoagulation with heparin were retrospectively studied. Thirty-six patients treated by CVVH in predilution and 27 in postdilution mode were studied, with 132 filters in the former and 111 in the latter. The filter life [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] was 24 ± 38 hours and 29 ± 46 hours (p = 0.58) in the pre- and postdilution modes, respectively. Although the fall in creatinine and urea depended on the dose, 19% greater delivered dose in the post- than predilution mode did not impact on azotemic control. In critically ill, heparinized patients on CVVH, filter life and azotemic control are similar in pre- and postdilution modes and underscore the clinical applicability of the predilution mode.

          Related collections

          Author and article information


          Comment on this article