246
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How to optimize the use of MRI in anatomic ACL reconstruction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most current diagnostic imaging procedure for suspected ACL injuries. It is an accurate, highly sensitive and specific tool for the diagnosis of ACL tears, graft tears and associated injuries. However, it can also be used for various other aspects of anatomic ACL reconstruction.

          Methods

          Special sequences as the oblique sagittal plane should be obtained from a parallel line to the lateral epicondyle, ensuring a proper visualization of both bundles of the ACL. Another special set of images, the oblique-coronal sequence, allows for the ACL long-axis evaluation. The coronal-oblique sequence increases the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing isolated AM or PL bundle injuries and also helps to visualize the proximal insertion of the bundles for haemorrhage and rupture.

          Results

          Quantitative measurements can be taken from a proper MRI protocol, so as to determine the rupture pattern; measure insertion site size, inclination angle and autograft size; and evaluate for post-operative complications. These parameters help surgeons to objectively decide for a better graft and technique for an individualized approach and to evaluate the anatomic placement of the graft.

          Conclusions

          MRI can be used in different ways, serving as a very valuable tool in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Special protocols can provide accurate visualization of the double-bundle anatomy. Objective parameters to aid in pre-operative decisions and graft’s anatomic placement evaluation can be also extracted from the MR images.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis.

          Meta-analysis. To define the accuracy of clinical tests for assessing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. The cruciate ligaments, and especially the ACL, are among the most commonly injured structures of the knee. Given the increasing injury prevalence, there is undoubtedly a growing need for clinical decision making of health care providers. We reviewed the literature to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination for assessing ACL ruptures. MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (1989 to April 2005), and CINAHL (1982 to April 2005) searches were performed. Also reference lists of the included studies were reviewed. Studies selected for data extraction were those that addressed the accuracy of at least 1 physical diagnostic test for ACL rupture and compared the performance of the clinical examination of the knee with a reference standard, such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or MRI. Searching was limited to English, German, and Dutch languages. Twenty-eight studies that assessed the accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosing ACL ruptures met the inclusion criteria. Study results were, however, heterogeneous. The Lachman test is the most valid test to determine ACL tears, showing a pooled sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83-87) and a pooled specificity of 94% (95% CI, 92-95). The pivot shift test is very specific, namely 98% (95% CI, 96-99), but has a poor sensitivity of 24% (95% CI, 21-27). The anterior drawer test shows good sensitivity and specificity in chronic conditions, respectively 92% (95% CI, 88-95) and 91% (95% CI, 87-94), but not in acute conditions. In case of suspected ACL injury it is recommended to perform the Lachman test. Because the pivot shift test is very specific both in acute as well as in chronic conditions, it is recommended to perform the pivot shift test as well.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review.

            Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of great aid in the diagnosis of knee lesions. Most diagnostic studies comparing MRI and arthroscopy have shown good diagnostic performance in detecting lesions of the menisci and cruciate ligaments. Nevertheless, arthroscopy has remained the reference standard for the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee, against which alternative diagnostic modalities should be compared. We took arthroscopy to be the 'gold standard', and we undertook a systematic review of MRI and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee. We used Coleman scoring methodology to identify scientifically sound articles in a reproducible format. MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. It is the most appropriate screening tool before therapeutic arthroscopy. It is preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in most patients because it avoids the surgical risks of arthroscopy. The results of MRI differ for medial and lateral meniscus and ACL, with only 85% accuracy. Study design characteristics should also be taken into account whenever a study on MRI assessing its diagnostic performance is designed or reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites.

              Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been toward anatomical reconstruction that restores the normal size and location of the anterior cruciate ligament insertions and its 2 bundles, the posterolateral (PL) and anteromedial (AM) bundles. This has resulted in a more individualized approach to ACLR. Several studies have shown that the size of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites is variable; however, these studies are limited by use of relatively small sample sizes and cadaveric specimens. This study was undertaken to evaluate the in vivo size variability of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites and its AM and PL bundles during arthroscopy in a large series of patients and to correlate these findings with individuals' physical characteristics (height, weight, and body mass index). Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. In 137 patients undergoing ACLR during the first 6 months after injury, the femoral and tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites and the 2 bundles were identified, marked with electrocautery, and measured with an arthroscopic ruler. Additionally, physical characteristics of the patients, including self-reported height, weight, and body mass index, were recorded. The tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion site had a mean length of 17.0 ± 2.0 mm. The tibial AM bundle length was 9.1 ± 1.2 mm and the width was 9.2 ± 1.1 mm. The tibial PL bundle insertion site length averaged 7.4 ± 1.0 mm and the width averaged 7.0 ± 1.0 mm. The femoral insertion sites had a mean length of 16.5 ± 2.0 mm. The length of the femoral AM bundle insertion site averaged 9.2 ± 1.2 mm and the width averaged 8.9 ± 0.9 mm. The femoral PL bundle insertion site length averaged 7.1 ± 1.1 mm and the width averaged 6.9 ± 1.0 mm. There were significant positive correlations between patient height and weight (P < .05) with femoral and tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion site length, tibial PL bundle insertion site length, femoral AM bundle insertion site length, and tibial AM bundle and PL bundle insertion site areas. However, the coefficients of determination values were low (1.0% to 19.4%). There is a large variation in size of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites and the AM and PL bundles. Additionally, there are significant but weak correlations between the size of the insertions and height, weight, and body mass index of the individual patient.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1-412-6053265 , +1-412-6870802 , ffu@msx.upmc.edu , ffu@upmc.edu
                Journal
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0942-2056
                1433-7347
                15 August 2012
                15 August 2012
                July 2013
                : 21
                : 7
                : 1495-1501
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufman Building Suite 1011, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
                Article
                2153
                10.1007/s00167-012-2153-9
                3685708
                22893266
                2d522e3d-ef23-4cbb-bcf2-381cac8be7cf
                © The Author(s) 2012
                History
                : 23 January 2012
                : 23 July 2012
                Categories
                Knee
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

                Surgery
                anatomic acl reconstruction,mri measurements,acl inclination angle,acl length,acl insertion site,graft size

                Comments

                Comment on this article