5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Text Messaging for Disease Monitoring in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          There is limited information on effective disease monitoring for prompt interventions in childhood nephrotic syndrome. We examined the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel text messaging system (SMS) for disease monitoring in a multicenter, prospective study.

          Methods

          A total of 127 patients <19 years with incident nephrotic syndrome were enrolled in the ongoing Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network between June 2015 and March 2018. Text messages soliciting home urine protein results, symptoms, and medication adherence were sent to a designated caregiver ( n = 116) or adolescent patient ( n = 3). Participants responded by texting. Feasibility of SMS was assessed by SMS adoption, retention, and engagement, and concordance between participant-reported results and laboratory/clinician assessments. The number of disease relapses and time-to-remission data captured by SMS were compared with data collected by conventional visits.

          Results

          A total of 119 of 127 (94%) patients agreed to SMS monitoring. Retention rate was 94%, with a median follow-up of 360 days (interquartile range [IQR] 353–362). Overall engagement was high, with a median response rate of 87% (IQR, 68–97). Concordance between SMS-captured home urine protein results and edema status with same-day in-person study visit was excellent (kappa values 0.88 and 0.92, respectively). SMS detected a total of 108 relapse events compared with 41 events captured by scheduled visits. Median time to remission after enrollment was 22 days as captured by SMS versus 50 days as captured by scheduled visits.

          Conclusion

          SMS was well accepted by caregivers and adolescent patients and reliably captured nephrotic syndrome disease activity between clinic visits. Additional studies are needed to explore the impact of SMS on disease outcomes.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings

          Background Remote measurement technology refers to the use of mobile health technology to track and measure change in health status in real time as part of a person’s everyday life. With accurate measurement, remote measurement technology offers the opportunity to augment health care by providing personalized, precise, and preemptive interventions that support insight into patterns of health-related behavior and self-management. However, for successful implementation, users need to be engaged in its use. Objective Our objective was to systematically review the literature to update and extend the understanding of the key barriers to and facilitators of engagement with and use of remote measurement technology, to guide the development of future remote measurement technology resources. Methods We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving original studies dating back to the last systematic review published in 2014. We included studies if they met the following entry criteria: population (people using remote measurement technology approaches to aid management of health), intervention (remote measurement technology system), comparison group (no comparison group specified), outcomes (qualitative or quantitative evaluation of the barriers to and facilitators of engagement with this system), and study design (randomized controlled trials, feasibility studies, and observational studies). We searched 5 databases (MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) for articles published from January 2014 to May 2017. Articles were independently screened by 2 researchers. We extracted study characteristics and conducted a content analysis to define emerging themes to synthesize findings. Formal quality assessments were performed to address risk of bias. Results A total of 33 studies met inclusion criteria, employing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods designs. Studies were conducted in 10 countries, included male and female participants, with ages ranging from 8 to 95 years, and included both active and passive remote monitoring systems for a diverse range of physical and mental health conditions. However, they were relatively short and had small sample sizes, and reporting of usage statistics was inconsistent. Acceptability of remote measurement technology according to the average percentage of time used (64%-86.5%) and dropout rates (0%-44%) was variable. The barriers and facilitators from the content analysis related to health status, perceived utility and value, motivation, convenience and accessibility, and usability. Conclusions The results of this review highlight gaps in the design of studies trialing remote measurement technology, including the use of quantitative assessment of usage and acceptability. Several processes that could facilitate engagement with this technology have been identified and may drive the development of more person-focused remote measurement technology. However, these factors need further testing through carefully designed experimental studies. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017060644; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=60644 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70K4mThTr)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Design of the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) to evaluate primary glomerular nephropathy by a multi-disciplinary approach

            The Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) is a North American multi-center collaborative consortium established to develop a translational research infrastructure for Nephrotic Syndrome. This includes a longitudinal observational cohort study, a pilot and ancillary studies program, a training program, and a patient contact registry. NEPTUNE will enroll 450 adults and children with minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and membranous nephropathy for detailed clinical, histopathologic, and molecular phenotyping at the time of clinically-indicated renal biopsy. Initial visits will include an extensive clinical history, physical examination, collection of urine, blood and renal tissue samples, and assessments of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Follow-up history, physical measures, urine and blood samples, and questionnaires will be obtained every 4 months in the first year and bi-annually, thereafter. Molecular profiles and gene expression data will be linked to phenotypic, genetic, and digitalized histologic data for comprehensive analyses using systems biology approaches. Analytical strategies were designed to transform descriptive information to mechanistic disease classification for Nephrotic Syndrome and to identify clinical, histological, and genomic disease predictors. Thus, understanding the complexity of the disease pathogenesis will guide further investigation for targeted therapeutic strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The primary nephrotic syndrome in children. Identification of patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome from initial response to prednisone. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children.

              The accuracy of using the initial response to prednisone to identify children with minimal glomerular changes has been assessed in a prospective study of children between 12 weeks and 16 years of age with the primary nephrotic syndrome. The results indicate that, as generally held, the likelihood is quite high, although not 100%, that a child with the primary nephrotic syndrome who responds during eight weeks of initial intensive steroid treatment has MCNS. Prognosis in these patients can be considered to be very favorable and renal biopsy need not be done unless indicated by the subsequent clinical course. However, the prediction that a patient who fails to respond has a glomerular lesion other than MCNS would be incorrect in about one-fourth of all patients with the primary nephrotic syndrome, and in as many as one-half of patients less than or equal to 6 years of age. For these patients, predictions concerning prognosis should be withheld until a renal biopsy provides a histopathologic diagnosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney International Reports
                Elsevier
                2468-0249
                07 May 2019
                August 2019
                07 May 2019
                : 4
                : 8
                : 1066-1074
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri at Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
                [5 ]Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
                [7 ]Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [8 ]Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
                [9 ]Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [11 ]Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
                [13 ]Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital-LA, Los Angeles, California, USA
                [14 ]Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
                [15 ]Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
                [16 ]Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Chia-shi Wang, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, 2015 Uppergate Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30322–1015, USA. chia-shi.wang@ 123456emory.edu
                Article
                S2468-0249(19)30173-1
                10.1016/j.ekir.2019.04.026
                6698307
                31440697
                2d90a768-c500-4fb0-a613-02e78f24ec77
                © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 19 January 2019
                : 3 April 2019
                : 29 April 2019
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                caregivers,children,health status,mobile health,nephrotic syndrome,text messaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article