45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring the movement dynamics of deception

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Both the science and the everyday practice of detecting a lie rest on the same assumption: hidden cognitive states that the liar would like to remain hidden nevertheless influence observable behavior. This assumption has good evidence. The insights of professional interrogators, anecdotal evidence, and body language textbooks have all built up a sizeable catalog of non-verbal cues that have been claimed to distinguish deceptive and truthful behavior. Typically, these cues are discrete, individual behaviors—a hand touching a mouth, the rise of a brow—that distinguish lies from truths solely in terms of their frequency or duration. Research to date has failed to establish any of these non-verbal cues as a reliable marker of deception. Here we argue that perhaps this is because simple tallies of behavior can miss out on the rich but subtle organization of behavior as it unfolds over time. Research in cognitive science from a dynamical systems perspective has shown that behavior is structured across multiple timescales, with more or less regularity and structure. Using tools that are sensitive to these dynamics, we analyzed body motion data from an experiment that put participants in a realistic situation of choosing, or not, to lie to an experimenter. Our analyses indicate that when being deceptive, continuous fluctuations of movement in the upper face, and somewhat in the arms, are characterized by dynamical properties of less stability, but greater complexity. For the upper face, these distinctions are present despite no apparent differences in the overall amount of movement between deception and truth. We suggest that these unique dynamical signatures of motion are indicative of both the cognitive demands inherent to deception and the need to respond adaptively in a social context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How animals move: an integrative view.

          Recent advances in integrative studies of locomotion have revealed several general principles. Energy storage and exchange mechanisms discovered in walking and running bipeds apply to multilegged locomotion and even to flying and swimming. Nonpropulsive lateral forces can be sizable, but they may benefit stability, maneuverability, or other criteria that become apparent in natural environments. Locomotor control systems combine rapid mechanical preflexes with multimodal sensory feedback and feedforward commands. Muscles have a surprising variety of functions in locomotion, serving as motors, brakes, springs, and struts. Integrative approaches reveal not only how each component within a locomotor system operates but how they function as a collective whole.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.

            Because of special characteristics of nonverbal behaviors (e.g., they can be difficult to suppress, they are more accessible to the people who observe them than to the people who produce them), the intention to produce a particular nonverbal expression for self-presentational purposes cannot always be successfully translated into the actual production of that expression. The literatures on people's skills at using their nonverbal behaviors to feign internal states and to deceive are reviewed as they pertain to the question of whether people can overcome the many constraints on the translation of their intentions into expressions. The issue of whether people's deliberate attempts to regulate their nonverbal behaviors can be detected by others is also considered.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.

              In two experiments, we tested the hypotheses that (a) the difference between liars and truth tellers will be greater when interviewees report their stories in reverse order than in chronological order, and (b) instructing interviewees to recall their stories in reverse order will facilitate detecting deception. In Experiment 1, 80 mock suspects told the truth or lied about a staged event and did or did not report their stories in reverse order. The reverse order interviews contained many more cues to deceit than the control interviews. In Experiment 2, 55 police officers watched a selection of the videotaped interviews of Experiment 1 and made veracity judgements. Requesting suspects to convey their stories in reverse order improved police observers' ability to detect deception and did not result in a response bias.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                27 March 2013
                2013
                : 4
                : 140
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced Merced, CA, USA
                [2] 2Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, University College London London, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wolfgang Ambach, Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health (IGPP), Germany

                Reviewed by: Giorgio Ganis, Plymouth University, UK; Birthe Aßmann, Niedersächsisches Institut für Frühkindliche Bildung und Entwicklung, Germany; Leanne Ten Brinke, University of California Berkeley, USA

                *Correspondence: Nicholas D. Duran, Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced, 5200 Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA. e-mail: nduran2@ 123456ucmerced.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Cognitive Science, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00140
                3608909
                23543852
                2d92079a-e642-4ebf-9981-f7cd151afa8b
                Copyright © 2013 Duran, Dale, Kello, Street and Richardson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 20 September 2012
                : 04 March 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, Equations: 3, References: 69, Pages: 16, Words: 11472
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                deception,non-linear measures,dynamical systems theory,embodiment,recurrence quantification analysis,multiscale entropy analysis,body and facial movements,time series analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log