+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Changes in Light Scattering Intensity of the Transparent Lenses of Subjects Selected from Population-Based Surveys Depending on Age: Analysis through Scheimpflug Images

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The physiological ageing changes of decreasing lens transparency were objectively evaluated in a total of 1,040 eyes selected from 1,685 individuals who were the subjects of population-based cataract epidemiological surveys performed in three climatically different survey fields in Japan. The lens transparency changes were evaluated from the light scattering intensity on thirteen different lens layers seen in slit images taken by the latest type of Scheimpflug camera. The mean percentage prevalence of cataracts in all the epidemiological survey subjects including grading from I to III, which was also judged objectively through documented images, was 64.6% in the Noto subjects, 46.6% in the Hokkaido subjects and 38.0% in the Okinawa subjects. The lens transparency at all of the measuring points decreased with ageing. The above changes, seen in the lenses of subjects in their 40s to 60s, were obviously more prominent compared with those seen in subjects in their 40s. Although there were some differences in transparency decrease with ageing among the subjects of the three areas, the authors tentatively propose to show the data obtained from the Noto subjects as representative of Japanese individuals. Lens transparency changes on each lens layer showed characteristic ageing changes and those of the representative four layers showed an exponential decrease in transparency. The decreasing ratio might accelerate from age as early as the mid-40s.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Ophthalmic Res
          Ophthalmic Research
          S. Karger AG
          11 December 2009
          : 27
          : 2
          : 89-101
          Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Japan
          267604 Ophthalmic Res 1995;27:89–101
          © 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article