20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Checklist of marine elasmobranchs of Colombia Translated title: Lista de verificação de elasmobrânquios da Colômbia Translated title: Lista de chequeo de elasmobranquios marinos de Colombia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract A review and update to the shark and ray species recorded for the marine waters of Colombia was carried out. A total of 206 species had been recorded in the literature, of which 138 species (76 sharks and 62 rays) could be confirmed from museum records, catches, photographs, and videos. No evidence was found for 25 species, but their distribution included neighboring countries, and they were therefore classified as possible based on distribution. Thirty- six species were classified as improbable based on distribution and seven more were considered as misidentifications. The inventory of confirmed species includes 57 genera (30 shark and 27 batoid genera) and 34 families (18 shark and 16 batoid families). There was notably an addition of 26 confirmed species since 2007 as well as numerous modifications to group systematics and taxonomy, especially for batoids. The total number of confirmed elasmobranchs represented 12.1% of species known worldwide, and could even reach 14.5%, indicating that Colombia has one of the richest cartilaginous fish faunas in Latin America, behind Mexico and Brazil. This demonstrates that although Colombia cannot be considered an elasmobranch biodiversity hotspot or site of elasmobranch endemism globally, it does have good representativity of these species’ biodiversity at the regional level, especially regarding amphi-American species.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo Realizou-se uma revisão e atualização dos registros de espécies de tubarões e arraias de água marinha colombianas. Na literatura se encontrava registro de um total de 206 espécies, das quais 138 (76 tubarões e 62 arraias) foram possíveis de confirmação por meio de registros de museus, capturas, fotografias e vídeos. Não se encontrou evidencia de 25 espécies, mas suas distribuições incluem países vizinhos, sendo então classificadas como “possível com base na distribuição”. Trinta e seis espécies se classificaram como “improváveis com base na distribuição” e outras sete se consideraram identificações errôneas. O inventário de espécies confirmadas inclui 57 gêneros (30 tubarões e 27 gêneros de batóides) e 34 famílias (18 tubarões e 16 famílias batóides). Notavelmente, houve uma adição de 26 espécies confirmadas desde 2007, assim como numerosas modificações da sistemática e taxonomia do grupo, especialmente para batóides. O número total de elasmobrânquios confirmados representou um 12.1 % das espécies conhecidas no mundo, e poderia ainda alcançar 14.5 %, o que indica que Colômbia tem uma das faunas mais rica da América Latina em peixes cartilaginosos, depois de México e Brasil. Isto mostra que Colômbia, ainda que possa não ser considerada um ponto de referência de biodiversidade de elasmobrânquios ou um local de endemismo de elasmobrânquios a nível global, possui uma boa representatividade da biodiversidade de estas espécies a nível regional, especialmente com respeito a espécies anfi-americanas.

          Translated abstract

          Resumen Se llevó a cabo una revisión y actualización de los registros de especies de tiburones y rayas de aguas marinas colombianas. En la literatura se había registrado un total de 206 especies, de las cuales 138 (76 tiburones y 62 rayas) se habian podido confirmar con registros de museo, capturas, fotografías y videos. No se encontró evidencia de 25 especies, pero su distibución incluye países vecinos, por lo que fueron clasificadas como “posible basada en la distribución”. Treinta y seis especies se clasficaron como “improbable basada en la distribución” y siete más se consideraron identificaciones erróneas. El inventario de especies confirmadas incluye 57 géneros (30 tiburones y 27 géneros batoideos) y 34 familias (18 tiburones y 16 familias batoideas). De modo notable, hubo una adición de 26 especies confirmadas desde 2007, así como numerosas modificaciones de la sistemática y taxonomía del grupo, especialmente para batoideos. El número total de elasmobranquios confirmados representó el 12.1 % de las especies conocidas en el mundo, y podría aún alcanzar el 14.5 %, lo cual indica que Colombia tiene una de las faunas de peces cartilaginosos más ricas de Latinoamérica, después de México y Brasil. Esto demuestra que, aunque Colombia no puede ser considerada un punto caliente de biodiversidad de elasmobranquios o un sitio de endemismo de elasmobranquios a nivel global, sí tiene una buena representatividad de la biodiversidad de estas especies a nivel regional, especialmente respecto a especies anfi-americanas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Annotated checklist of the living sharks, batoids and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) of the world, with a focus on biogeographical diversity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transequatorial migrations by basking sharks in the western Atlantic Ocean.

            The world's second largest fish, the basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus), is broadly distributed in boreal to warm temperate latitudes of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans from shallow coastal waters to the open ocean. Previous satellite archival tagging in the North Atlantic has shown that basking sharks move seasonally, are often associated with productive frontal zones, and may make occasional dives to mesopelagic depths. However, basking sharks are thought to be restricted to temperate latitudes, and the extent to which they exploit deeper-water habitat remains enigmatic. Via satellite archival tags and a novel geolocation technique, we demonstrate here that basking sharks are seasonal migrants to mesopelagic tropical waters. Tagged sharks moved from temperate feeding areas off the coast of southern New England to the Bahamas, the Caribbean Sea, and onward to the coast of South America and into the Southern Hemisphere. When in these areas, basking sharks descended to mesopelagic depths and in some cases remained there for weeks to months at a time. Our results demonstrate that tropical waters are not a barrier to migratory connectivity for basking shark populations and highlight the need for global conservation efforts throughout the species range.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global Diversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities for Sharks

              Sharks are one of the most threatened groups of marine animals, as high exploitation rates coupled with low resilience to fishing pressure have resulted in population declines worldwide. Designing conservation strategies for this group depends on basic knowledge of the geographic distribution and diversity of known species. So far, this information has been fragmented and incomplete. Here, we have synthesized the first global shark diversity pattern from a new database of published sources, including all 507 species described at present, and have identified hotspots of shark species richness, functional diversity and endemicity from these data. We have evaluated the congruence of these diversity measures and demonstrate their potential use in setting priority areas for shark conservation. Our results show that shark diversity across all species peaks on the continental shelves and at mid-latitudes (30–40 degrees N and S). Global hotspots of species richness, functional diversity and endemicity were found off Japan, Taiwan, the East and West coasts of Australia, Southeast Africa, Southeast Brazil and Southeast USA. Moreover, some areas with low to moderate species richness such as Southern Australia, Angola, North Chile and Western Continental Europe stood out as places of high functional diversity. Finally, species affected by shark finning showed different patterns of diversity, with peaks closer to the Equator and a more oceanic distribution overall. Our results show that the global pattern of shark diversity is uniquely different from land, and other well-studied marine taxa, and may provide guidance for spatial approaches to shark conservation. However, similar to terrestrial ecosystems, protected areas based on hotspots of diversity and endemism alone would provide insufficient means for safeguarding the diverse functional roles that sharks play in marine ecosystems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                unsc
                Universitas Scientiarum
                Univ. Sci.
                Facultad de Ciencias de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Bogotá. (Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia )
                0122-7483
                April 2019
                : 24
                : 1
                : 164-199
                Affiliations
                [1] Cali orgnameFundación colombiana para la investigación y conservación de tiburones y rayas, SQUALUS Colombia
                [2] Cali orgnameWildlife Conservation Society Colombia
                Article
                S0122-74832019000100164
                10.11144/javeriana.sc24-1.come
                2d9a76f9-257e-44f8-b179-9970021c43d5

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 24 September 2018
                : 28 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 36
                Product

                SciELO Colombia

                Categories
                Articles

                richness,biodiversidade,tubarões e batóides,riqueza,lista de espécies,lista de especies,tiburones y batoideos,biodiversidad,Biodiversity,sharks and batoids,species list

                Comments

                Comment on this article