23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      eReferral — A New Model for Integrated Care

      , ,
      New England Journal of Medicine
      Massachusetts Medical Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Electronic Referrals for Specialty Care at a Public Hospital

          BACKGROUND Poor communication between referring clinicians and specialists may lead to inefficient use of specialist services. San Francisco General Hospital implemented an electronic referral system (eReferral) that facilitates iterative pre-visit communication between referring and specialty clinicians to improve the referral process. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of eReferral (compared with paper-based referrals) on specialty referrals. DESIGN The study was based on a visit-based questionnaire appended to new patient charts at randomly selected specialist clinic sessions before and after the implementation of eReferral. PARTICIPANTS Specialty clinicians. MAIN MEASURES The questionnaire focused on the self-reported difficulty in identifying referral question, referral appropriateness, need for and avoidability of follow-up visits. KEY RESULTS We collected 505 questionnaires from speciality clinicians. It was difficult to identify the reason for referral in 19.8% of medical and 38.0% of surgical visits using paper-based methods vs. 11.0% and 9.5% of those using eReferral (p-value 0.03 and <0.001). Of those using eReferral, 6.4% and 9.8% of medical and surgical referrals using paper methods vs. 2.6% and 2.1% were deemed not completely appropriate (p-value 0.21 and 0.03). Follow-up was requested for 82.4% and 76.2% of medical and surgical patients with paper-based referrals vs. 90.1% and 58.1% of eReferrals (p-value 0.06 and 0.01). Follow-up was considered avoidable for 32.4% and 44.7% of medical and surgical follow-ups with paper-based methods vs. 27.5% and 13.5% with eReferral (0.41 and <0.001). CONCLUSION Use of technology to promote standardized referral processes and iterative communication between referring clinicians and specialists has the potential to improve communication between primary care providers and specialists and to increase the effectiveness of specialty referrals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Monitoring Local Safety-Net Providers: Do They Have Adequate Capacity?

              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              New England Journal of Medicine
              N Engl J Med
              Massachusetts Medical Society
              0028-4793
              1533-4406
              June 27 2013
              June 27 2013
              : 368
              : 26
              : 2450-2453
              Article
              10.1056/NEJMp1215594
              23802515
              2da979d9-12f2-473c-8e32-6ad80f03fc66
              © 2013
              History

              Comments

              Comment on this article