8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Duration of antibiotic treatment for common infections in English primary care: cross sectional analysis and comparison with guidelines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate the duration of prescriptions for antibiotic treatment for common infections in English primary care and to compare this with guideline recommendations.

          Design

          Cross sectional study.

          Setting

          General practices contributing to The Health Improvement Network database, 2013-15.

          Participants

          931 015 consultations that resulted in an antibiotic prescription for one of several indications: acute sinusitis, acute sore throat, acute cough and bronchitis, pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute otitis media, acute cystitis, acute prostatitis, pyelonephritis, cellulitis, impetigo, scarlet fever, and gastroenteritis.

          Main outcome measures

          The main outcomes were the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions with a duration exceeding the guideline recommendation and the total number of days beyond the recommended duration for each indication.

          Results

          The most common reasons for antibiotics being prescribed were acute cough and bronchitis (386 972, 41.6% of the included consultations), acute sore throat (239 231, 25.7%), acute otitis media (83 054, 8.9%), and acute sinusitis (76 683, 8.2%). Antibiotic treatments for upper respiratory tract indications and acute cough and bronchitis accounted for more than two thirds of the total prescriptions considered, and 80% or more of these treatment courses exceeded guideline recommendations. Notable exceptions were acute sinusitis, where only 9.6% (95% confidence interval 9.4% to 9.9%) of prescriptions exceeded seven days and acute sore throat where only 2.1% (2.0% to 2.1%) exceeded 10 days (recent guidance recommends five days). More than half of the antibiotic prescriptions were for longer than guidelines recommend for acute cystitis among females (54.6%, 54.1% to 55.0%). The percentage of antibiotic prescriptions exceeding the recommended duration was lower for most non-respiratory infections. For the 931 015 included consultations resulting in antibiotic prescriptions, about 1.3 million days were beyond the durations recommended by guidelines.

          Conclusion

          For most common infections treated in primary care, a substantial proportion of antibiotic prescriptions have durations exceeding those recommended in guidelines. Substantial reductions in antibiotic exposure can be accomplished by aligning antibiotic prescription durations with guidelines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antibiotics in primary care in England: which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions?

          To analyse antibiotic prescribing behaviour in English primary care with particular regard to which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cumulative antibiotic exposures over time and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection.

            Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea and is most commonly associated with changes in normal intestinal flora caused by administration of antibiotics. Few studies have examined the risk of CDI associated with total dose, duration, or number of antibiotics while taking into account the complex changes in exposures over time. A retrospective cohort study conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2005 among hospitalized patients 18 years or older receiving 2 or more days of antibiotics. The study identified 10,154 hospitalizations for 7,792 unique patients and 241 cases of CDI, defined as the detection of C. difficile toxin in a diarrheal stool sample within 60 days of discharge. We observed dose-dependent increases in the risk of CDI associated with increasing cumulative dose, number of antibiotics, and days of antibiotic exposure. Compared to patients who received only 1 antibiotic, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for those who received 2, 3 or 4, or 5 or more antibiotics were 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-4.0), 3.3 (CI 2.2-5.2), and 9.6 (CI 6.1-15.1), respectively. The receipt of fluoroquinolones was associated with an increased risk of CDI, while metronidazole was associated with reduced risk. Cumulative antibiotic exposures appear to be associated with the risk of CDI. Antimicrobial stewardship programs that focus on the overall reduction of total dose as well as number and days of antibiotic exposure and the substitution of high-risk antibiotic classes for lower-risk alternatives may reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired CDI. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Potential for reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in English primary care.

              To identify and quantify inappropriate systemic antibiotic prescribing in primary care in England, and ultimately to determine the potential for reduction in prescribing of antibiotics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: mathematical modeller
                Role: consultant in infectious diseases and microbiology
                Role: professor of infectious diseases
                Role: professor of medical statistics and epidemiology
                Role: consultant microbiologist
                Role: senior mathematical modeller
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2019
                27 February 2019
                : 364
                : l440
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Modelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK
                [2 ]Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
                [3 ]Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [4 ]Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
                [5 ]Directorate of Infection, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [6 ]National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit on Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Oxford, UK
                [7 ]Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK
                [8 ]Department of Microbiology and Infection, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
                [9 ]Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK
                [10 ]Public Health England Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: KB Pouwels k.b.pouwels@ 123456gmail.com (or @kb_pouwels on Twitter)
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-8950
                Article
                pouk046953
                10.1136/bmj.l440
                6391655
                30814052
                2db12db4-c613-4931-b862-03d5fd5bf761
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 January 2019
                Categories
                Research
                1778

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article