2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cannabis Use in a Cohort of Healthcare-Seeking United States Military Veterans With Persisting Symptoms After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Preliminary Observations

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Introduction

          Cannabis products, including cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are increasingly easy to procure and use across the United States. The 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) reported a past-month cannabis use rate of 8.6% among adults 26 years of age or older in the U.S. general population. Cannabis use is commonly reported by U.S. Military Veterans with histories of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) receiving services at the Marcus Institute for Brain Health (MIBH), a specialty interdisciplinary clinic serving this population. The aims of this study are to describe the frequency and characteristics of cannabis product use among Veterans evaluated at MIBH and to compare the rate of cannabis use in this group to that in the general and Veteran populations reported in the 2018 NSDUH.

          Materials and Methods

          Study data were collected as part of MIBH clinical assessments between January 2018 and December 2019, which included the evaluation of the current use of cannabis products. Affirmative cannabis use responses were clarified with inquiries about the frequency of use, method of administration, product ingredients (i.e., THC and/or CBD), and reason(s) for use.

          Results

          Among 163 MIBH patients (92.6% male), 72 (44.2%) endorsed cannabis product use during the month preceding the clinical assessment. Cannabis users were significantly younger than nonusers. The frequency of past-month cannabis use was significantly greater than that reported in the comparably aged NSDUH survey general and Veteran populations (44.2% vs. 8.6% and 44.2% vs. 7.7%, respectively, both P < .00001). Among the 72 MIBH patients reporting cannabis use, 62 (86.1%) reported THC or combination product use, and 10 (13.9%) reported CBD product use. Concurrent medication use, including psychotropic medications use, did not differ significantly between cannabis users and nonusers.

          Conclusions

          Self-reported cannabis use is significantly higher in the MIBH population than in similarly aged individuals in the general population and significantly more frequent among younger than older members of this cohort. Self-reported reasons for cannabis use in this cohort included mTBI-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms, sleep disturbances, and pain for which standard treatments (both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic) provided insufficient relief and/or produced treatment-limiting adverse events. However, cannabis use did not provide sufficient improvement in those symptoms to obviate the need for further evaluation and treatment of those problems at MIBH or to replace, in part or in whole, standard medications and other treatments for those problems. Further study of cannabis use, including standardized individual cannabinoid (i.e., THC and CBD) and whole-plant cannabis preparations, in this and similar cohorts is needed to more fully understand the drivers, benefits, risks, and safety of cannabis use in this and in similar Veteran populations, as well as the potential pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological therapeutic alternatives to cannabis use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Practical considerations in medical cannabis administration and dosing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method.

            Evaluate the psychometric properties of indices of a lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Convenience samples recruited from 2 treatment programs for persons with substance use disorders: N = 119 (study 1) and N = 103 (study 2) Test interrater reliability (study 1) and predictive validity (Study 2). Summary indices of the number, severity, timing, and effects of lifetime TBIs calculated from data elicited via a structured interview. Interrater reliability was high. Factor analysis showed indices could be characterized by severity weighted counts of the number of injuries, both lifetime and in childhood, number of symptoms persisting, worst injury, time since last TBI with loss of consciousness, and age at first TBI with loss of consciousness. Age at injury and symptoms persisting contributed independently to the prediction of common cognitive and behavioral consequences of TBI. These results provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of summary indices of lifetime history of TBI elicited via a structured interview.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of the Association Between the Level of Cannabis Use and Risk of Psychosis.

              Cannabis use has been reported to induce long-lasting psychotic disorders and a dose-response relationship has been observed. We performed a systematic review of studies that investigate the association between the degree of cannabis consumption and psychosis and a meta-analysis to quantify the magnitude of effect. Published studies were identified through search of electronic databases, supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies. Studies were considered if they provided data on cannabis consumption prior to the onset of psychosis using a dose criterion (frequency/amount used) and reported psychosis-related outcomes. We performed random effects meta-analysis of individual data points generated with a simulation method from the summary data of the original studies. From 571 references, 18 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 10 were inserted in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 66 816 individuals. Higher levels of cannabis use were associated with increased risk for psychosis in all the included studies. A logistic regression model gave an OR of 3.90 (95% CI 2.84 to 5.34) for the risk of schizophrenia and other psychosis-related outcomes among the heaviest cannabis users compared to the nonusers. Current evidence shows that high levels of cannabis use increase the risk of psychotic outcomes and confirms a dose-response relationship between the level of use and the risk for psychosis. Although a causal link cannot be unequivocally established, there is sufficient evidence to justify harm reduction prevention programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Military Medicine
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0026-4075
                1930-613X
                January 22 2022
                January 22 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Marcus Institute for Brain Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
                [2 ]VISN 15 Clinical Resource Hub, Dwight D. Eisenhower VA Medical Center, Leavenworth, KS 66048, USA
                [3 ]Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
                [5 ]Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
                Article
                10.1093/milmed/usac011
                35064271
                2dc1ed79-f162-4320-87db-bb0346a93116
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article