18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neglecting Long-Term Risks: Self-Disclosure on Social Media and Its Relation to Individual Decision-Making Tendencies and Problematic Social-Networks-Use

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Social media including social-networking sites (SNS) encourage people to disclose personal information via profiles and posts. It is assumed that positive short-term effects and immediate feedback (e.g., getting Likes) have a rewarding nature and may complicate the rational weighing of possible negative long-term consequences related to self-disclosure. Dual-process theories assume risky behaviors to result from more impulsive/short-term oriented compared to reflective/long-term oriented decision making. The current laboratory study investigates whether the extent of online self-disclosure is explained by the general tendency to choose short-term rewards by neglecting long-term risks as well as by tendencies toward a problematic social-networks-use. Participants ( N = 88) were asked to log into their Facebook account to answer questions about their actual self-disclosing behavior. Furthermore, they performed an experimental decision-making task and answered a questionnaire assessing problematic social-networks-use. The quantity of self-disclosure via posts was negatively associated with advantageous decision making and positively with tendencies toward a problematic social-networks-use. The findings indicate that high self-disclosure via posts is associated with a general tendency to neglect long-term risks. Moreover, a problematic social-networks-use can additionally increase individual’s self-disclosure via posts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior

            Icek Ajzen (1985)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1

              A protection motivation theory is proposed that postulates the three crucial components of a fear appeal to be (a) the magnitude of noxiousness of a depicted event; (b) the probability of that event's occurrence; and (c) the efficacy of a protective response. Each of these communication variables initiates corresponding cognitive appraisal processes that mediate attitude change. The proposed conceptualization is a special case of a more comprehensive theoretical schema: expectancy-value theories. Several suggestions are offered for reinterpreting existing data, designing new types of empirical research, and making future studies more comparable. Finally, the principal advantages of protection motivation theory over the rival formulations of Janis and Leventhal are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                27 October 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 543388
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg–Essen , Duisburg, Germany
                [2] 2Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Essen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Petko Kusev, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Adele Diederich, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany; Johanna Schäwel, University of Hohenheim, Germany

                *Correspondence: Sina Ostendorf, sina.ostendorf@ 123456uni-due.de

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543388
                7653023
                33192787
                2dfd4dd0-9be7-4dd0-a4bb-1e4261d866d0
                Copyright © 2020 Ostendorf, Müller and Brand.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 March 2020
                : 05 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 107, Pages: 17, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dual-process,decision making,social media,social-networks-use disorder,privacy,self-disclosure

                Comments

                Comment on this article