35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Multicenter Phase II Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing Therapy vs. Treatment as Usual in Patients With Substance Use Disorder and History of Psychological Trauma: A Study Design and Protocol

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Psychological trauma has a strong negative impact on the onset, course and prognosis of substance use disorders (SUD). Few trauma-oriented treatment approaches have been trialed, but preliminary evidence exists of the efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in improving clinical symptoms in SUD patients.

          Objective: To assess if EMDR therapy leads to: (1) reduced substance consumption; (2) an improvement in psychopathological and in trauma-related symptoms; and (3) an improvement in overall functioning. Our hypothesis is that the EMDR group will improve in all variables when compared to the treatment as usual (TAU) group at 6 and 12-months visits.

          Method: In this multicenter phase II rater-blinded randomized controlled trial, 142 SUD patients with a history of psychological trauma will be randomly assigned to EMDR ( n = 71) or to TAU ( n = 71). Patients in the EMDR group will receive 20 psychotherapeutic sessions of 60 min over 6 months. Substance use will be measured using the Timeline Followback Questionnaire, the Dependence Severity Scale and the Visual Analog Scale. Traumatic events will be measured by The Holmes-Rahe Life Stress Inventory, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Scale, the Global Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Questionnaire, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Clinical symptomatology will be evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Functionality will be assessed with the Functioning Assessment Short Test. All variables will be measured at baseline, post-treatment and 12 months as follow-up. Primary outcome: to test the efficacy of EMDR therapy in reducing the severity of substance use. The secondary outcomes: to test the efficacy in reducing trauma-related psychological symptoms and psychopathological symptoms and in improving overall functioning in patients with comorbid SUD and a history of psychological trauma.

          Conclusion: This study will provide evidence of whether EMDR therapy is effective in reducing addiction-related, trauma and clinical symptoms and in improving functionality in patients with SUD and a history of trauma.

          Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03517592.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          The Impact of Event Scale: Revised

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).

              According to 19th century French psychiatry and contemporary clinical observations, dissociation pertains to both psychological and somatoform components of experience, reactions, and functions. Because such an instrument was lacking, we aimed to develop a self-reporting questionnaire measuring what we propose to call somatoform dissociation. Patients with dissociate disorder and with other DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses completed a list of 75 items that, according to clinical experience and expert judgment, could reflect instances of somatoform dissociation. Separate logistic analyses and determination of discriminant indices per item revealed 20 items that best discriminated between those with and without dissociative disorders. Mokken analysis showed that these items are strongly scalable on a dimensional latent scale interpreted to measure somatoform dissociation. Reliability of the scale was high. Construct validity was supported by high intercorrelations with the Dissociation Questionnaire, which measures psychological dissociation, and higher scores of patients with dissociative identity disorder compared with patients with dissociative disorders not otherwise specified. In conclusion, the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20) is a scale of good psychometric quality, which measures somatoform dissociation. The symptoms pertain to negative and positive dissociative phenomena, which were well known in 19th century French psychiatry as the mental stigmata and mental accidents of hysteria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                15 March 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 108
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions , Barcelona, Spain
                [2] 2IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) , Barcelona, Spain
                [3] 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Hospital del Mar , Barcelona, Spain
                [5] 5Department of Psychiatry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [6] 6Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer , Barcelona, Spain
                [7] 7Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London , London, United Kingdom
                [8] 8Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [9] 9Benito Menni Complex Assistencial en Salut Mental , Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
                [10] 10Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatments, University of Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [11] 11RETICS-Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud en Trastornos Adictivos , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Xiaochu Zhang, University of Science and Technology of China, China

                Reviewed by: Domenico De Berardis, Azienda Usl Teramo, Italy; Franco De Crescenzo, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Ana Moreno-Alcázar amoreno1@ 123456imim.es

                This article was submitted to Addictive Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00108
                6428746
                2dfeccb1-bf33-4630-aa45-e8c74a754819
                Copyright © 2019 Valiente-Gómez, Moreno-Alcázar, Radua, Hogg, Blanco, Lupo, Pérez, Robles-Martínez, Torrens and Amann.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 November 2018
                : 13 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 64, Pages: 10, Words: 7762
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Clinical Study Protocol

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                substance use disorder,addiction,psychological trauma,comorbidity,emdr therapy,treatment as usual

                Comments

                Comment on this article