Blog
About

8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      "Allow natural death" is not equivalent to " do not resuscitate": a response.

      1 ,

      Journal of medical ethics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Venneman and colleagues argue that "do not resuscitate" (DNR) is problematic and should be replaced by "allow natural death" (AND). Their argument is flawed. First, while end-of-life discussions should be as positive as possible, they cannot and should not sidestep painful but necessary confrontations with morality. Second, while DNR can indeed be nonspecific and confusing, AND merely replaces one problematic term with another. Finally, the study's results are not generalisable to the populations of physicians and working nurses and certainly do not support the authors' claim that there is a movement to replace DNR with AND.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Med Ethics
          Journal of medical ethics
          1473-4257
          0306-6800
          Dec 2008
          : 34
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. yxc96@case.edu
          Article
          19065754

          Comments

          Comment on this article