22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Fragebogen zum Problem-Monitoring für Eltern, Lehrer und Jugendliche–eine deutsche Fassung des Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) : Konstruktion, Reliabilität und Validität

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Der Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) ist eine, in den USA bereits psychometrisch überprüfte, Kurzform der Child Behavior Checkliste (CBCL) und der davon abgeleiteten Verfahren. Wie die US-Version, umfasst die deutsche Übersetzung drei Skalen (Internale Probleme-INT, Aufmerksamkeitsprobleme-AP und Externale Probleme-EXT) und liegt ebenfalls in drei Perspektiven (Eltern, Lehrer und Jugendliche) vor. Methode: Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften (Reliabilität und Validität) der deutschen Übersetzung des BPM wurden sowohl anhand von Klinik- als auch Feldstichproben von Kindern im Alter zwischen 6 und 18 Jahren überprüft. Ergebnisse: Die Ergebnisse weisen auf gute Reliabilität und, mit einigen Einschränkungen, auf eine gute Validität hin. Schlussfolgerung: Mit wenigen Einschränkungen kann der deutsche BPM/6 – 18 daher sowohl als reliables als auch valides Instrument bewertet werden.

          German Version of the Brief Problem Monitor for Parents, Teachers and Adolescents

          Abstract. Background: The Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) is a short version of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and its derived questionnaires and has already been psychometrically tested and approved in its English original version. The German translation likewise comprises three subscales (Internalizing-INT, Attention Problems-ATT, and Externalizing-EXT) and is available for multiple informants (parent, teacher, and youth report). Method: The psychometric characteristics (reliability and validity) of the German translation were examined by means of clinical as well as population-based samples of children aged 6 – 18 years. Results: The results indicate good reliability and, with some constraints, good validity. Conclusion: The German translation of the BPM can be judged as a reliable and valid instrument.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The generalizability of the Youth Self-Report syndrome structure in 23 societies.

          As a basis for theories of psychopathology, clinical psychology and related disciplines need sound taxonomies that are generalizable across diverse populations. To test the generalizability of a statistically derived 8-syndrome taxonomic model for youth psychopathology, confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed on the Youth Self-Report (T. M. Achenbach & L. A. Rescorla, 2001) completed by 30,243 youths 11-18 years old from 23 societies. The 8-syndrome taxonomic model met criteria for good fit to the data from each society. This was consistent with findings for the parent-completed Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) and the teacher-completed Teacher's Report Form (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) from many societies. Separate CFAs by gender and age group supported the 8-syndrome model for boys and girls and for younger and older youths within individual societies. The findings provide initial support for the taxonomic generalizability of the 8-syndrome model across very diverse societies, both genders, and 2 age groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How often do children meet ICD-10/DSM-IV criteria of attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder? Parent-based prevalence rates in a national sample--results of the BELLA study.

            There is a lack of representative prevalence rates for attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) according to DSM-IV criteria and hyperkinetic disorder (HD) according to ICD-10 criteria for German subjects. To report the results of analyses of categorical data on the prevalence rates of the symptoms of ADHD/HD and additional diagnostic criteria, as well as of the diagnoses of ADHD and HD according to symptoms and other diagnostic criteria, according to the ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Further, to report administrative prevalence rates of the diagnosis and rates of co-existing behavioural and emotional problems. Within the BELLA module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS), a representative sample of parents of 2,452 children and adolescents aged 7-17 years completed an ADHD symptom checklist (FBB-HKS/ADHS) and additional questionnaires for the assessment of coexisting behavioural and emotional problems. The prevalence rates for the diagnoses of ADHD according to DSM-IV criteria were 5.0% and the rate for HD according to ICD-10 criteria was 1.0%. Higher prevalence rates were found in boys and in younger children. The addition of other diagnostic criteria (impairment, pervasiveness, onset, duration) resulted in a significant decrease of the prevalence rates of ADHD and HD to 2.2 and 0.6%, respectively. Higher prevalence rates were found in families of lower socioeconomic status and families from urban areas. The lifetime administrative prevalence rate was 6.5%. Children with ADHD had an increased risk for coexisting behavioural and emotional problems, especially for aggressive and antisocial behaviour problems, but also for anxiety and mood problems. The results of the national sample are in line with community studies in other countries. The effects of the additional diagnostic criteria of impairment, situational pervasiveness, symptom onset and symptom duration on the prevalence rates have to be considered in other epidemiological studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability and validity of Brief Problem Monitor, an abbreviated form of the Child Behavior Checklist.

              The parent form of the 113-item Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is widely utilized by child psychiatrists and psychologists. This report examines the reliability and validity of a recently developed abbreviated version of the CBCL, the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                zkp
                Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
                Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen
                1616-3443
                2190-6297
                2015
                : 44
                : 3
                : 197-206
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln
                [ 2 ]Ausbildungsinstitut für Kinder- und Jugendlichenpsychotherapie an der Uniklinik Köln (AKiP)
                Author notes
                Univ.-Prof. Dr. Manfred Döpfner, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters an der Uniklinik Köln, Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931 Köln, E-Mail manfred.doepfner@ 123456uk-koeln.de
                Article
                zkp_44_3_197
                10.1026/1616-3443/a000307
                2eabf9b0-e2d3-4cbb-9374-6102c00855cb
                Copyright @ 2015
                History
                Categories
                Originalia

                Psychology,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                construction,validity,CBCL,BPM,Konstruktion,Reliabilität,Validität,reliability

                Comments

                Comment on this article