10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of regional retinal responses on cortical visually evoked responses: Multifocal ERGs and VEPs in the retinitis pigmentosa model

      , , , , ,  
      Clinical Neurophysiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine the impact of the regional retinal responses on cortical visually evoked responses, by evaluating the relationship between multifocal ERG (mfERG) and multifocal VEP (mfVEP), in the retinitis pigmentosa (RP) model. MfERGs and mfVEPs were recorded from 20 typical RP patients. Response amplitude density (RAD, nV/deg(2)) and implicit time (ms) of the mfERG 1st order binary kernel (N1-P1) and mfVEP 2nd order binary kernel (P1) components were measured. Ring analysis, matched for mfERG and mfVEP stimuli, was performed between fovea and mid-periphery (0-2.5, 2.5-5, 5-10, 10-15 and 15-20deg). At central and pericentral retinal regions (four eccentricities between 0 and 15deg), mfERG N1 RADs were positively correlated (r0.68, p<0.01) with corresponding mfVEP P1 RADs. Similarly, mfERG P1 implicit times were positively correlated (r>or=0.65, p<0.01) with corresponding mfVEP N1 implicit times. There are quantitative correlations between mfERG and mfVEP components in RP. The data suggest that regional responses of the photoreceptors and off-bipolar cells, the main generators of mfERG N1, have a major impact on the corresponding cortical activity.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clinical Neurophysiology
          Clinical Neurophysiology
          Elsevier BV
          13882457
          March 2010
          March 2010
          : 121
          : 3
          : 380-385
          Article
          10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.032
          20071230
          2eb3ec88-6c83-4ed9-89bc-cbfe4095ee79
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article