29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process.

          Methods

          We systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction.

          Results

          We included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card).

          Conclusions

          Non-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Increasing utilisation of emergency ambulances.

          Increased ambulance utilisation is closely linked with Emergency Department (ED) attendances. Pressures on hospital systems are widely acknowledged with ED overcrowding reported regularly in the media and peer-reviewed literature. Strains on ambulance services are less well-documented or studied. To review the literature to determine the trends in utilisation of emergency ambulances throughout the developed world and to discuss the major underlying drivers perceived as contributing to this increase. A search of online databases, search engines, peer-reviewed journals and audit reports was undertaken. Ambulance utilisation has increased in many developed countries over the past 20 years. Annual growth rates throughout Australia and the United Kingdom are similar. Population ageing, changes in social support, accessibility and pricing, and increasing community health awareness have been proposed as associated factors. As the extent of their contribution has not yet been established these factors were reviewed. The continued rise in utilisation of emergency ambulances is placing increasing demands on ambulance services and the wider health system, potentially compromising access, quality, safety and outcomes. A variety of factors may contribute to this increase and targeted strategies to reduce utilisation will require an accurate identification of the major drivers of demand.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Why do patients with ‘primary care sensitive’ problems access ambulance services? A systematic mapping review of the literature

            Objective Emergency ambulance use for problems that could be managed in primary care continues to rise owing to complex reasons that are poorly understood. The objective of this systematic review is to draw together published evidence across a variety of study methodologies and settings to gain a better understanding of why patients seek help from ambulance services for these problems. Design Systematic searches were undertaken across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Health Management Information Consortium and Health Management Information Service publication databases. Google Scholar, Web of Science, OpenSigle, EThOS and DART databases were also systematically searched for reports, proceedings, book chapters and theses, along with hand-searching of grey literature sources. Studies were included if they reported on findings examining patient, carer, health professional or service management interactions with ambulance services for primary care problems. All study methodologies and perspectives were of interest. Data were extracted, quality assessed and systematically mapped according to key findings through generation of an iterative framework. Results A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings were summarised across 5 broad categories: factors associated with individual patients; actions of care-givers and bystanders; population-level factors; health infrastructure factors; challenges faced by health professionals. A number of subcategories were developed to explore these factors in more detail. Conclusions This review reports important factors that may impact on ambulance use for primary care problems across a global setting, including demographic measures associated with deprivation, minority status and individual social circumstances. Categorising ambulance calls for primary care problems as ‘inappropriate’ is context dependant and may be unhelpful. Potential implications for triage and risk management strategies are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Decision-making by ambulance clinicians in London when managing patients with epilepsy: a qualitative study.

              In the UK, epilepsy is the neurological condition with the highest rate of accident and emergency department re-attendance, with most arriving by ambulance. Ambulance clinicians triage patients and assess their need for attendance. This study examined the decision-making process of ambulance clinicians in these situations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 (0)243530717 , Remco.Ebben@han.nl
                Lilian.Vloet@han.nl
                Renate.Speijers@vrgz.nl
                n.tonjes@ravijsselland.nl
                Jorikloef@gmail.com
                Thomas.Pelgrim@han.nl
                M.Hoogeveen@ambulancezorg.nl
                Sivera.Berben@han.nl
                Journal
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1757-7241
                17 July 2017
                17 July 2017
                2017
                : 25
                : 71
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8809 2093, GRID grid.450078.e, Research Department of Emergency and Critical Care, , HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, ; PO Box 6960, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Ambulance Service Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Ambulance Service IJsselland, Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Ambulance Academy, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Dutch National Sector Organisation for Ambulance Care, Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, , Radboud University Medical Center, Eastern Regional Emergency Healthcare Network, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Article
                409
                10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6
                5513207
                28716132
                2eb753ed-f821-4b3b-b9c7-58c6408a3b37
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 April 2017
                : 22 June 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Dutch National Sector Organisation for Ambulance Care
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                emergency medical services [mesh],patient safety [mesh],clinical competence [mesh],non-conveyance

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content163

                Cited by68

                Most referenced authors949