2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long photoperiod impairs learning in male but not female medaka

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Day length in conjunction with seasonal cycles affects many aspects of animal biology. We have studied photoperiod-dependent alterations of complex behavior in the teleost, medaka ( Oryzias latipes), a photoperiodic breeder, in a learning paradigm whereby fish have to activate a sensor to obtain a food reward. Medaka were tested under a long (14:10 LD) and short (10:14 LD) photoperiod in three different groups: mixed-sex, all-males, and all-females. Under long photoperiod, medaka mixed-sex groups learned rapidly with a stable response. Unexpectedly, males-only groups showed a strong learning deficit, whereas females-only groups performed efficiently. In mixed-sex groups, female individuals drove group learning, whereas males apparently prioritized mating over feeding behavior resulting in strongly reduced learning performance. Under short photoperiod, where medaka do not mate, male performance improved to a level similar to that of females. Thus, photoperiod has sex-specific effects on the learning performance of a seasonal vertebrate.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Fish can learn by association using a self-feeder system and food reward

          • Medaka show sex-specific and seasonal differences in cognitive performance

          • On long days, sexually active male medaka are poor learners compared with females

          • Under short days, non-mating male medaka learn better

          Abstract

          Ichthyology; Cognitive neuroscience

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.

          Zebrafish have become a popular organism for the study of vertebrate gene function. The virtually transparent embryos of this species, and the ability to accelerate genetic studies by gene knockdown or overexpression, have led to the widespread use of zebrafish in the detailed investigation of vertebrate gene function and increasingly, the study of human genetic disease. However, for effective modelling of human genetic disease it is important to understand the extent to which zebrafish genes and gene structures are related to orthologous human genes. To examine this, we generated a high-quality sequence assembly of the zebrafish genome, made up of an overlapping set of completely sequenced large-insert clones that were ordered and oriented using a high-resolution high-density meiotic map. Detailed automatic and manual annotation provides evidence of more than 26,000 protein-coding genes, the largest gene set of any vertebrate so far sequenced. Comparison to the human reference genome shows that approximately 70% of human genes have at least one obvious zebrafish orthologue. In addition, the high quality of this genome assembly provides a clearer understanding of key genomic features such as a unique repeat content, a scarcity of pseudogenes, an enrichment of zebrafish-specific genes on chromosome 4 and chromosomal regions that influence sex determination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sexual conflict

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Egg and sperm quality in fish.

              Fish egg quality can be defined as the ability of the egg to be fertilized and subsequently develop into a normal embryo. Similarly, sperm quality can be defined as its ability to successfully fertilize an egg and subsequently allow the development of a normal embryo. In the wild or under aquaculture conditions, the quality of fish gametes can be highly variable and is under the influence of a significant number of external factors or broodstock management practices. For these reasons, the topic of gamete quality has received increasing attention. Despite the significant efforts made towards a better understanding of the factors involved in the control of gamete quality, the picture is far from being complete and the control of gamete quality remains an issue in the aquaculture industry. Some of the factors responsible for the observed variability of gamete quality remain largely unknown or poorly understood. In addition very little is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the control of egg and sperm quality. In the present review, the molecular and cellular characteristics of fish gametes are presented with a special interest for the mechanisms that could participate in the regulation of gamete quality. Then, after defining egg and sperm quality, and how can it can be accurately estimated or predicted, we provide an overview of the main factors that can impact gamete quality in teleosts. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                iScience
                iScience
                iScience
                Elsevier
                2589-0042
                25 June 2021
                23 July 2021
                25 June 2021
                : 24
                : 7
                : 102784
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems, Biological Information Processing (IBCS-BIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Physiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
                [3 ]Institute for Applied Computer Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
                [5 ]School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, No.222 South Tianshui Road, 730000 Lanzhou, PR China
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author felix.loosli@ 123456kit.edu
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author nicholas.foulkes@ 123456kit.edu
                [6]

                These authors contributed equally

                [7]

                Lead contact

                Article
                S2589-0042(21)00752-5 102784
                10.1016/j.isci.2021.102784
                8283132
                2ebcb0e8-3b19-4af2-9c82-d29a2570f400
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 9 October 2020
                : 12 March 2021
                : 23 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                ichthyology,cognitive neuroscience
                ichthyology, cognitive neuroscience

                Comments

                Comment on this article