11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Body Size Variation in Italian Lesser Horseshoe Bats Rhinolophus hipposideros over 147 Years: Exploring the Effects of Climate Change, Urbanization and Geography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Animal body size varies in response to many environmental factors and may be influenced by climate change, food availability, habitat alterations or species interactions. Here, we use a specimen collection of Italian rhinolophid bats ( Rhinolophus hipposideros) covering a long historical period (1869–2016) and looked at their body and skull size to see whether these changed over time and space. Although no temporal responses were recorded, which rules out an effect of climate change or urbanization, we found an increase in body size from south to north along the Italian territory which is best explained according to Bergmann’s rule. The latter postulates that larger individuals retain heat more effectively, so their presence in northern, colder climates is favoured, whereas, smaller ones dissipate heat more easily and are best adapted to cope with southern, warmer climates.

          Abstract

          Body size in animals commonly shows geographic and temporal variations that may depend upon several environmental drivers, including climatic conditions, productivity, geography and species interactions. The topic of body size trends across time has gained momentum in recent years since this has been proposed as a third universal response to climate change along with changes in distribution and phenology. However, disentangling the genuine effects of climate change from those of other environmental factors is often far from trivial. In this study, we tested a set of hypotheses concerning body size variation across time and space in Italian populations of a rhinolophid bat, the lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros. We examined forearm length (FAL) and cranial linear traits in a unique historical collection of this species covering years from 1869 to 2016, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the longest time series ever considered in a morphological assessment of a bat species. No temporal changes occurred, rejecting the hypotheses that body size varied in response to climate change or urbanization (light pollution). We found that FAL increased with latitude following a Bergmann’s rule trend, whereas the width of upper incisors, likely a diet-related trait, showed an opposite pattern which awaits explanation. We also confirmed that FAL is sexually dimorphic in this species and ruled out that insularity has any detectable effect on the linear traits we considered. This suggests that positive responses of body size to latitude do not mean per se that concurring temporal responses to climate change are also expected. Further investigations should explore the occurrence of these patterns over larger spatial scales and more species in order to detect the existence of general patterns across time and space.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is Bergmann’s Rule Valid for Mammals?

            Bergmann's rule states that, within species of mammals, individuals tend to be larger in cooler environments. However, the validity of the rule has been debated. We examined the relationship between size and latitude as well as size and temperature within various species of mammals. We also tested the idea that smaller mammals follow Bergmann's rule more strongly than larger mammals, as expected if heat conservation is the cause of the rule. When all studies were included, the percentage of species showing a positive correlation between size and latitude was significantly >50% (78 of 110 species). Similarly, the percentage of species showing a negative correlation between size and temperature was significantly >50% (48 of 64). Analyses using only significant studies or only studies that sampled extensively also support Bergmann's rule. The size-latitude and size-temperature trends were consistent within all orders and most families for which data are available. We did not find support for the hypothesis that smaller mammals conform more strongly to Bergmann's rule than larger mammals. Thus, we found broad support for Bergmann's rule as a general trend for mammals; however, our analyses do not support heat conservation as the explanation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes.

              We show that the distributions of both exploited and nonexploited North Sea fishes have responded markedly to recent increases in sea temperature, with nearly two-thirds of species shifting in mean latitude or depth or both over 25 years. For species with northerly or southerly range margins in the North Sea, half have shown boundary shifts with warming, and all but one shifted northward. Species with shifting distributions have faster life cycles and smaller body sizes than nonshifting species. Further temperature rises are likely to have profound impacts on commercial fisheries through continued shifts in distribution and alterations in community interactions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biology (Basel)
                Biology (Basel)
                biology
                Biology
                MDPI
                2079-7737
                30 December 2020
                January 2021
                : 10
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wildlife Research Unit, Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, via Università, 100, 80055 Portici, Italy; valeria.salinasramos@ 123456unina.it (V.B.S.-R.); leonardo.ancillotto@ 123456unina.it (L.A.)
                [2 ]Sistema Museale dell’Università di Firenze, Museo di Storia Naturale, Sede di Zoologia La Specola, via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy; paolo.agnelli@ 123456unifi.it
                [3 ]Laboratorio de Sistemas de Información Geográfica, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico; victor@ 123456ib.unam.mx
                Author notes
                Article
                biology-10-00016
                10.3390/biology10010016
                7824098
                33396640
                2ec303cc-0f0a-48e2-9161-5eb34838d104
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                Categories
                Article

                bat,bergmann’s rule,climate change,land use change,light pollution,morphology,natural history collections

                Comments

                Comment on this article