1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Relative Power of Negativity: The Influence of Language Intensity on Perceived Strength

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Negative utterances and words have been found to be stronger than positive utterances and words, but what happens if positive and negative utterances are intensified? Two online experiments were carried out in which participants judged the strength of (un)intensified positive and negative evaluations in written dialogues. Both studies showed intensified language was perceived as stronger than unmarked language (i.e., language that was not intensified), and negative evaluations were stronger than positive evaluations. What is more, intensification and polarity interact; the increment of perceived strength for intensified positive adjectives (Study 1) and purely intensified adverbs ( really, very; Study 2) was bigger than the increment in perceived strength of intensified negative adjective and adverbs. When a meaningful intensifier ( deliciously, disgustingly) was used, the negativity effect remained. The findings were discussed within cognitive frameworks such as relevance theory, theory of mind, and theory on verbal aggression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis.

          Negative (adverse or threatening) events evoke strong and rapid physiological, cognitive, emotional, and social responses. This mobilization of the organism is followed by physiological, cognitive, and behavioral responses that damp down, minimize, and even erase the impact of that event. This pattern of mobilization-minimization appears to be greater for negative events than for neutral or positive events. Theoretical accounts of this response pattern are reviewed. It is concluded that no single theoretical mechanism can explain the mobilization-minimization pattern, but that a family of integrated process models, encompassing different classes of responses, may account for this pattern of parallel but disparately caused effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Lang Soc Psychol
                J Lang Soc Psychol
                JLS
                spjls
                Journal of Language and Social Psychology
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0261-927X
                1552-6526
                10 January 2019
                March 2019
                : 38
                : 2
                : 170-193
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
                [2 ]Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]Christine Liebrecht, Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands. Email: c.c.liebrecht@ 123456tilburguniversity.edu
                Article
                10.1177_0261927X18808562
                10.1177/0261927X18808562
                6380456
                2ed8278b-9938-4b7b-ab34-3dd78ba23e53
                © The Author(s) 2018

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                polarity,language intensity,stylistics,pollyanna principle,negativity bias,word-of-mouth

                Comments

                Comment on this article