1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Detection of Tick-Borne Bacteria from Whole Blood Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene PCR Followed by Next-Generation Sequencing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reported cases of tick-borne diseases have steadily increased for more than a decade. In the United States, a majority of tick-borne infections are caused by bacteria.

          ABSTRACT

          Reported cases of tick-borne diseases have steadily increased for more than a decade. In the United States, a majority of tick-borne infections are caused by bacteria. Clinical diagnosis may be challenging, as tick-borne diseases can present with similar symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis has historically relied on serologic methods, which have limited utility during the acute phase of disease. Pathogen-specific molecular methods have improved early diagnosis, but can be expensive when bundled together and may miss unexpected or novel pathogens. To address these shortcomings, we developed a 16S rRNA gene PCR with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach to detect tick-borne bacteria in whole blood. A workflow was optimized by comparing combinations of two extraction platforms and two primer sets, ultimately pursuing DNA extraction from blood with the MagNA Pure 96 and PCR amplification using dual-priming oligonucleotide primers specific to the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplified product underwent modified Illumina 16S metagenomics sequencing library preparation and sequencing on a MiSeq V2 Nano flow cell, with data analysis using Pathogenomix RipSeq NGS software. Results with the developed method were compared to those from a V1-V2 16S rRNA gene primer set described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The V1-V3 assay demonstrated equivalent performance to the CDC assay, with each method showing concordance with targeted PCR results in 31 of 32 samples, and detecting 22 of 23 expected organisms. These data demonstrate the potential for using a broad-range bacterial detection approach for diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial infection from blood.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States.

          Tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to cause severe illness and death in otherwise healthy adults and children, despite the availability of low-cost, effective antibacterial therapy. Recognition early in the clinical course is critical because this is the period when antibacterial therapy is most effective. Early signs and symptoms of these illnesses are nonspecific or mimic other illnesses, which can make diagnosis challenging. Previously undescribed tickborne rickettsial diseases continue to be recognized, and since 2004, three additional agents have been described as causes of human disease in the United States: Rickettsia parkeri, Ehrlichia muris-like agent, and Rickettsia species 364D. This report updates the 2006 CDC recommendations on the diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases in the United States and includes information on the practical aspects of epidemiology, clinical assessment, treatment, laboratory diagnosis, and prevention of tickborne rickettsial diseases. The CDC Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, in consultation with external clinical and academic specialists and public health professionals, developed this report to assist health care providers and public health professionals to 1) recognize key epidemiologic features and clinical manifestations of tickborne rickettsial diseases, 2) recognize that doxycycline is the treatment of choice for suspected tickborne rickettsial diseases in adults and children, 3) understand that early empiric antibacterial therapy can prevent severe disease and death, 4) request the appropriate confirmatory diagnostic tests and understand their usefulness and limitations, and 5) report probable and confirmed cases of tickborne rickettsial diseases to public health authorities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Identification of a novel pathogenic Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis with unusually high spirochaetaemia: a descriptive study.

            Lyme borreliosis is the most common tick-borne disease in the northern hemisphere. It is a multisystem disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies and characterised by tissue localisation and low spirochaetaemia. In this study we aimed to describe a novel Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis in the USA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication.

              Periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid PCR has been previously studied for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis; however, few studies have assessed the utility of PCR on biofilms dislodged from the surface of explanted arthroplasties using vortexing and sonication (i.e., sonicate fluid PCR). We compared sonicate fluid 16S rRNA gene real-time PCR and sequencing to culture of synovial fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid for the microbiologic diagnosis of PJI. PCR sequences generating mixed chromatograms were decatenated using RipSeq Mixed. We studied sonicate fluids from 135 and 231 subjects with PJI and aseptic failure, respectively. Synovial fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid culture and sonicate fluid PCR had similar sensitivities (64.7, 70.4, 72.6, and 70.4%, respectively; P > 0.05) and specificities (96.9, 98.7, 98.3, and 97.8%, respectively; P > 0.05). Combining sonicate fluid culture and PCR, the sensitivity was higher (78.5%, P < 0.05) than those of individual tests, with similar specificity (97.0%). Thirteen subjects had positive sonicate fluid culture but negative PCR, and 11 had negative sonicate fluid culture but positive PCR (among which 7 had prior use of antimicrobials). Broad-range PCR and culture of sonicate fluid have equivalent performance for PJI diagnosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Microbiology
                J Clin Microbiol
                American Society for Microbiology
                0095-1137
                1098-660X
                April 20 2021
                April 20 2021
                : 59
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [2 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
                [3 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                Article
                10.1128/JCM.03129-20
                33627320
                2eec7321-c4d3-4ce0-affa-465bf14573c4
                © 2021

                https://doi.org/10.1128/ASMCopyrightv2

                https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article