6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Therapy of Sialorrhea with Botulinum Neurotoxin

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is considered the treatment of choice for various symptoms and diseases such as focal dystonia and focal spasticity. The effects of BoNT on the salivary glands have also been known for years, but their use was limited because of a lack of approval studies. Now the indication of sialorrhea is approved in some countries for incobotulinumtoxinA, such as the USA and Europe, and therapy could also become the treatment of choice. According to the pivotal study, a dose of 100 units of incobotulinumtoxinA, which is divided into the parotid and submandibular glands, is recommended. RimabotulinumtoxinB is approved in the USA only. To define the value of this therapy, we must consider anatomy, physiology, and available therapies. Therapy includes conservative measures such as functional dysphagia therapy, oral or transdermal application of anticholinergics, and, in selected cases, radiotherapy and surgical procedures. A combination of different approaches is optional. On the basis of the evidence and clinical experience, BoNT injections will be the first line of pharmacotherapy for chronic sialorrhea.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Behavioural intervention for dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial.

            Swallowing dysfunction after stroke is common, but there is little reliable evidence for how the disorder should be managed. This study compared standard low-intensity and high-intensity behavioural interventions with usual care for dysphagia. 306 patients with clinical dysphagia admitted to hospital with acute stroke were randomly assigned to receive usual care (n=102), prescribed by the attending physician; standard low-intensity intervention (n=102), comprising swallowing compensation strategies and diet prescription three times weekly for up to a month; or standard high-intensity intervention and dietary prescription (n=102), at least daily for up to a month. The primary outcome measure was survival free of an abnormal diet at 6 months. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00257764. 60 patients died and three patients were lost to follow up before the 6-month analysis. Of patients randomly allocated usual care, 56% (57/102) survived at 6 months free of an abnormal diet compared with 67% (136/204) allocated standard swallowing therapy (relative risk 1.19, 95% CI 0.98-1.45). Standard swallowing therapy was associated with a non-significant trend toward a reduction in death (0.80, 0.5-1.3), institutionalisation (0.69, 0.4-1.1), and dependency (1.05, 0.8-1.3); a significant reduction in swallowing-related medical complications (0.73, 0.6-0.9), chest infection (0.56, 0.4-0.8), and death or institutionalisation (0.73, 0.55-0.97); and a significant rise in the proportion of patients regaining swallowing function (1.41, 1.03-1.94) by 6 months. Compared with usual care and low-intensity therapy, high-intensity therapy was associated with an increased proportion of patients who returned to a normal diet (p=0.04) and recovered swallowing (p=0.02) by 6 months. These data show a consistent trend towards more favourable outcomes in dysphagic stroke patients who are assigned a standard programme of early behavioural swallowing intervention, including active therapeutic approaches and dietary modification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Role of salivary mucins in the protection of the oral cavity.

              Mucins are the principal organic constituents of mucus, the slimy visco-elastic material that coats all mucosal surfaces. Compelling evidence suggests that they play an integral role in non-immune protection of the oral cavity. Specific protective functions include: 1) protection against desiccation and environmental insult, 2) lubrication, and 3) antimicrobial effects against potential pathogens. Biosynthesis of mucin is regulated by both intrinsic ("cooperative sequential specificity") and extrinsic ("structural modulation") controls. These controls form the basis by which mucin's structure can be modified to meet a dynamically changing biological need.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                W.Jost@parkinson-klinik.de
                Journal
                Neurol Ther
                Neurol Ther
                Neurology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8253
                2193-6536
                21 September 2019
                21 September 2019
                December 2019
                : 8
                : 2
                : 273-288
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.492054.e, Parkinson-Klinik Ortenau, ; Wolfach, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.4562.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0057 2672, Paediatric and Adult Movement Disorders and Neuropsychiatry, Institut of Neurogenetics, , University of Lübeck, ; Lübeck, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.411984.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0482 5331, ENT Department, , University Medical Center, ; Göttingen, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.11451.30, ISNI 0000 0001 0531 3426, Neurology Department, , Medical University of Gdansk, ; Gdańsk, Poland
                [5 ]GRID grid.10493.3f, ISNI 0000000121858338, Center for Transdisciplinary Neurosciences Rostock (CTNR), , University of Rostock, ; Rostock, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.4562.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0057 2672, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, , University of Lübeck, UKSH, ; Lübeck, Germany
                [7 ]Krankenhaus Rummelsberg, Schwarzenbruck, Germany
                [8 ]GRID grid.416928.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0496 3293, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, ; Liverpool, UK
                Article
                155
                10.1007/s40120-019-00155-6
                6858891
                31542879
                2f1c74d0-36ea-43b3-90e5-d69c2882bfa8
                © The Author(s) 2019
                History
                : 9 August 2019
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                anticholinergics,botulinum toxin,drooling,dysphagia,sialorrhea

                Comments

                Comment on this article