1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of Cortisol on Carbohydrate, Lipid, and Protein Metabolism: Studies of Acute Cortisol Withdrawal in Adrenocortical Failure

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cortisol is an important catabolic hormone, but little is known about the metabolic effects of acute cortisol deficiency. The objective of the study was to test whether clinical symptoms of weight loss, fatigue, and hypoglycemia could be explained by altered energy expenditure, protein metabolism, and insulin sensitivity during cortisol withdrawal in adrenocortical failure. We studied seven women after 24-h cortisol withdrawal and during replacement control during a 3-h basal period and a 3-h glucose clamp. Cortisol withdrawal generated cortisol levels close to zero, a 10% decrease in basal energy expenditure, increased TSH and T(3) levels, and increased glucose oxidation. Whole-body glucose and phenylalanine turnover were unaltered, but forearm phenylalanine turnover was increased. During the clamp glucose, infusion rates rose by 70%, glucose oxidation rates increased, and endogenous glucose production decreased. Urinary urea excretion decreased by 40% over the 6-h study period. Cortisol withdrawal increased insulin sensitivity in terms of increased glucose oxidation and decreased endogenous glucose production; this may induce hypoglycemia in adrenocortical failure. Energy expenditure and urea loss decreased, indicating that weight and muscle loss in Addison's disease is caused by other mechanisms, such as decreased appetite. Increased muscle protein breakdown may amplify the loss of muscle protein.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.

          The secretion of glucocorticoids (GCs) is a classic endocrine response to stress. Despite that, it remains controversial as to what purpose GCs serve at such times. One view, stretching back to the time of Hans Selye, posits that GCs help mediate the ongoing or pending stress response, either via basal levels of GCs permitting other facets of the stress response to emerge efficaciously, and/or by stress levels of GCs actively stimulating the stress response. In contrast, a revisionist viewpoint posits that GCs suppress the stress response, preventing it from being pathologically overactivated. In this review, we consider recent findings regarding GC action and, based on them, generate criteria for determining whether a particular GC action permits, stimulates, or suppresses an ongoing stress-response or, as an additional category, is preparative for a subsequent stressor. We apply these GC actions to the realms of cardiovascular function, fluid volume and hemorrhage, immunity and inflammation, metabolism, neurobiology, and reproductive physiology. We find that GC actions fall into markedly different categories, depending on the physiological endpoint in question, with evidence for mediating effects in some cases, and suppressive or preparative in others. We then attempt to assimilate these heterogeneous GC actions into a physiological whole.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cortisol-induced insulin resistance in man: impaired suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose utilization due to a postreceptor detect of insulin action.

            The present studies were undertaken to assess the mechanisms responsible for cortisol-induced insulin resistance in man. The insulin dose-response characteristics for suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose utilization and their relationship to monocyte and erythrocyte insulin receptor binding were determined in six normal volunteers after 24-h infusion of cortisol and 24-h infusion of saline. The infusion of cortisol (2 microgram kg-1 min-1) increased the plasma cortisol concentration approximately 4-fold (37 +/- 3 vs. 14 +/- 1 microgram/dl; P less than 0.01) to values observed during moderately severe stress in man. This hypercortisolemia increased postabsorptive plasma glucose (126 +/- 2 vs. 97 +/- 2 mg/dl; P less than 0.01) and plasma insulin (16 +/- 2 vs. 10 +/- 2 microU/ml; P less than 0.01) concentrations and rates of glucose production (2.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- -0.1 mg kg-1 min-1; P less than 0.01) and utilization (2.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg kg-1 min -1; P less than 0.01). Insulin dose-response curves for both suppression of glucose production (half-maximal response at 81 +/- 19 vs. 31 +/ 5 microU/ml; P less than 0.05) and stimulation of glucose utilization (half-maximal response at 104 +/- 9 vs. 64 +/- 7 microU/ml; P less than 0.01) were shifted to the right, with preservation of normal maximal responses to insulin. Neither monocyte nor erythrocyte insulin binding was decreased. However, except at near-maximal insulin receptor occupancy, the action of insulin on glucose production and utilization per number of monocyte and erythrocyte insulin receptors occupied was decreased. These results indicate that the cortisol-induced insulin resistance in man is due to the decrease in both hepatic and extrahepatic sensitivity to insulin. Assuming that insulin binding to monocytes and erythrocytes reflects insulin binding in insulin-sensitive tissues, this decrease in insulin action can be explained on the basis of a postreceptor defect.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of cortisol on lipolysis and regional interstitial glycerol levels in humans.

              Cortisol's effects on lipid metabolism are controversial and may involve stimulation of both lipolysis and lipogenesis. This study was undertaken to define the role of physiological hypercortisolemia on systemic and regional lipolysis in humans. We investigated seven healthy young male volunteers after an overnight fast on two occasions by means of microdialysis and palmitate turnover in a placebo-controlled manner with a pancreatic pituitary clamp involving inhibition with somatostatin and substitution of growth hormone, glucagon, and insulin at basal levels. Hydrocortisone infusion increased circulating concentrations of cortisol (888 +/- 12 vs. 245 +/- 7 nmol/l). Interstitial glycerol concentrations rose in parallel in abdominal (327 +/- 35 vs. 156 +/- 30 micromol/l; P = 0.05) and femoral (178 +/- 28 vs. 91 +/- 22 micromol/l; P = 0.02) adipose tissue. Systemic [(3)H]palmitate turnover increased (165 +/- 17 vs. 92 +/- 24 micromol/min; P = 0.01). Levels of insulin, glucagon, and growth hormone were comparable. In conclusion, the present study unmistakably shows that cortisol in physiological concentrations is a potent stimulus of lipolysis and that this effect prevails equally in both femoral and abdominal adipose tissue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
                The Endocrine Society
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                September 01 2007
                September 01 2007
                : 92
                : 9
                : 3553-3559
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Medical Department M, Aarhus Sygehus and Medical Research Laboratories, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 C Århus, Denmark
                Article
                10.1210/jc.2007-0445
                17609300
                2f6e8581-9c4d-4dd2-b90c-a19cdf9552a6
                © 2007
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article