8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: what the radiologist needs to know

      , , ,
      Skeletal Radiology
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

          Injury to the ipsilateral graft used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or a new injury to the contralateral ACL are disastrous outcomes after successful ACL reconstruction (ACLR), rehabilitation, and return to activity. Studies reporting ACL reinjury rates in younger active populations are emerging in the literature, but these data have not yet been comprehensively synthesized.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study.

            The incidence of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the general population is not well defined.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

              Background: Tearing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft is a devastating occurrence after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Identifying and understanding the independent predictors of ACLR graft failure is important for surgical planning, patient counseling, and efforts to decrease the risk of graft failure. Hypothesis: Patient and surgical variables will predict graft failure after ACLR. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: A multicenter group initiated a cohort study in 2002 to identify predictors of ACLR outcomes, including graft failure. First, to control for confounders, a single surgeon’s data (n = 281 ACLRs) were used to develop a multivariable regression model for ACLR graft failure. Evaluated variables were graft type (autograft vs allograft), sex, age, body mass index, activity at index injury, presence of a meniscus tear, and primary versus revision reconstruction. Second, the model was validated with the rest of the multicenter study’s data (n = 645 ACLRs) to evaluate the generalizability of the model. Results: Patient age and ACL graft type were significant predictors of graft failure for all study surgeons. Patients in the age group of 10 to 19 years had the highest percentage of graft failures. The odds of graft rupture with an allograft reconstruction are 4 times higher than those of autograft reconstructions. For each 10-year decrease in age, the odds of graft rupture increase 2.3 times. Conclusion: There is an increased risk of ACL graft rupture in patients who have undergone allograft reconstruction. Younger patients also have an increased risk of ACL graft failure. Clinical Relevance: Given these risks for ACL graft rupture, allograft ACLRs should be performed with caution in the younger patient population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Skeletal Radiology
                Skeletal Radiol
                Springer Nature
                0364-2348
                1432-2161
                May 2018
                December 28 2017
                May 2018
                : 47
                : 5
                : 619-629
                Article
                10.1007/s00256-017-2857-5
                29285553
                2f704cc7-d246-4a19-812d-0c634fdc61c4
                © 2018

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article