20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A Test of Multisession Automatic Action Tendency Retraining to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Among Young Adults in the Context of a Human Laboratory Paradigm

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5467456e200">Background</h5> <p id="P1">Young adult heavy drinking is an important public health concern. Current interventions have efficacy but with only modest effects, thus novel interventions are needed. In prior studies, heavy drinkers, including young adults, have demonstrated stronger automatically triggered approach tendencies to alcohol-related stimuli than lighter drinkers. Automatic action tendency retraining has been developed to correct this tendency and consequently reduce alcohol consumption. The current study is the first to test multiple iterations of automatic action tendency retraining, followed by laboratory alcohol self-administration. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5467456e205">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">A total of 72 non-treatment-seeking, heavy drinking young adults ages 21–25 were randomized to automatic action tendency retraining or a control condition (i.e., “sham training”). Of these, 69 (54% male) completed 4 iterations of retraining or the control condition over 5 days with an alcohol drinking session on Day 5. Self-administration was conducted according to a human laboratory paradigm designed to model individual differences in impaired control (i.e., difficulty adhering to limits on alcohol consumption). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5467456e210">Results</h5> <p id="P3">Automatic action tendency retraining was not associated with greater reduction in alcohol approach tendency or less alcohol self-administration than the control condition. The laboratory paradigm was probably sufficiently sensitive to detect an effect of an experimental manipulation given the range of self-administration behavior observed, both in terms of number of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks and measures of drinking topography. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d5467456e215">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">Automatic action tendency retraining was ineffective among heavy drinking young adults without motivation to change their drinking. Details of the retraining procedure may have contributed to the lack of a significant effect. Despite null primary findings, the impaired control laboratory paradigm is a valid laboratory-based measure of young adult alcohol consumption that provides the opportunity to observe drinking topography and self-administration of non-alcoholic beverages (i.e., protective behavioral strategies directly related to alcohol use). </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of Alcohol Withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Consequences of Automatic Evaluation: Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome.

              This study tested the effects of a new cognitive-bias modification (CBM) intervention that targeted an approach bias for alcohol in 214 alcoholic inpatients. Patients were assigned to one of two experimental conditions, in which they were explicitly or implicitly trained to make avoidance movements (pushing a joystick) in response to alcohol pictures, or to one of two control conditions, in which they received no training or sham training. Four brief sessions of experimental CBM preceded regular inpatient treatment. In the experimental conditions only, patients' approach bias changed into an avoidance bias for alcohol. This effect generalized to untrained pictures in the task used in the CBM and to an Implicit Association Test, in which alcohol and soft-drink words were categorized with approach and avoidance words. Patients in the experimental conditions showed better treatment outcomes a year later. These findings indicate that a short intervention can change alcoholics' automatic approach bias for alcohol and may improve treatment outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
                Alcohol Clin Exp Res
                Wiley
                01456008
                April 2018
                April 2018
                March 12 2018
                : 42
                : 4
                : 803-814
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Education and Behavior; University of Florida; Gainesville Florida
                [2 ]Yale School of Medicine; New Haven Connecticut
                [3 ]Department of Psychology; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam the Netherlands
                [4 ]Swedish Medical Center; Seattle Washington
                [5 ]Department of Psychology; Yale University; New Haven Connecticut
                Article
                10.1111/acer.13613
                5995797
                29450895
                2f794b8c-c2bd-499e-beca-2233eaca06d2
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article